2002Transactions of the ASAEOpen access

THE WEPP MODEL FOR RUNOFF AND EROSION PREDICTION UNDER SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

D. C. Kincaid

Open full text 22 citations

Abstract

Potential runoff and erosion is a serious problem for some types of sprinkler irrigation systems, particularlytraveling laterals and center pivots on medium to heavytextured soils operating on sloping land. Prediction of when runoffmight occur is part of the system design process. The USDAARS Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model was testedwith 3 years of field data under highrate sprinklers in southern Idaho. Runoff and soil loss were measured on the upper,middle, and lower portions of a hillslope. The main parameter affecting infiltration and runoff was the effective hydraulicconductivity. Model predictions for average runoff and soil loss were improved when hydraulic conductivity values wereadjusted to account for soil variability across the field. Runoff amounts were small, and prediction variability for individualfurrows was quite high, but no more than would be expected from previous studies of infiltration variability. Soil losspredictions were unreliable for the small runoff amounts occurring in this study. The most reasonable use of WEPP forsprinkler irrigation would be for estimating when potential runoff might occur under center pivots for different soils, slopes,and crop management practices, and to determine limits on application depths and rates to avoid serious runoff.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Potential runoff and erosion is a serious problem for some types of sprinkler irrigation systems, particularlytraveling laterals and center pivots on medium to heavytextured soils operating on sloping land. Prediction of when runoffmight occur is part of the system design process. The USDAARS Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model was testedwith 3 years of field data under highrate sprinklers in southern Idaho. Runoff and soil loss were measured on the upper,middle, and lower portions of a hillslope. The main parameter affecting infiltration and runoff was the effective hydraulicconductivity. Model predictions for average runoff and soil loss were improved when hydraulic conductivity values wereadjusted to account for soil variability across the field. Runoff amounts were small, and prediction variability for individualfurrows was quite high, but no more than would be expected from previous studies of infiltration variability. Soil losspredictions were unreliable for the small runoff amounts occurring in this study. The most reasonable use of WEPP forsprinkler irrigation would be for estimating when potential runoff might occur under center pivots for different soils, slopes,and crop management practices, and to determine limits on application depths and rates to avoid serious runoff.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Potential runoff and erosion is a serious problem for some types of sprinkler irrigation systems, particularlytraveling laterals and center pivots on medium to heavytextured soils operating on sloping land. Prediction of when runoffmight occur is part of the system design process. The USDAARS Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model was testedwith 3 years of field data under highrate sprinklers in southern Idaho. Runoff and soil loss were measured on the upper,middle, and lower portions of a hillslope. The main parameter affecting infiltration and runoff was the effective hydraulicconductivity. Model predictions for average runoff and soil loss were improved when hydraulic conductivity values wereadjusted to account for soil variability across the field. Runoff amounts were small, and prediction variability for individualfurrows was quite high, but no more than would be expected from previous studies of infiltration variability. Soil losspredictions were unreliable for the small runoff amounts occurring in this study. The most reasonable use of WEPP forsprinkler irrigation would be for estimating when potential runoff might occur under center pivots for different soils, slopes,and crop management practices, and to determine limits on application depths and rates to avoid serious runoff.

Key concepts: WEPP, Surface runoff, Infiltration (HVAC), Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Erosion, Soil water, Hydraulic conductivity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE WEPP MODEL FOR RUNOFF AND EROSION PREDICTION UNDER SPRINKLER IRRIGATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens