1986•Applied EconomicsRequires access

A second look at the US-Australian monetary growth causal nexus

Allan Patrick. Layton

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In earlier work, using the Granger (1969, 1980) notion of causality couched in terms of post-sample perdictability, Layton (1983) found prima facie statistical evidence to support the notion that US monetary growth may be regarded as a leading indicator of Australian monetary growth. However, that study was bivariate in nature and did not take into consideration the influence on Australian monetary growth of any domestic factors. Using the same causality concept, the present analysis extends this work by conducting the causality testing in the trivariate context, taking explicit account of the influence of domestic income growth in determining Australian monetary growth. The evidence continues to support the earlier finding that US monetary growth is Granger-causal to Australian monetary growth.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In earlier work, using the Granger (1969, 1980) notion of causality couched in terms of post-sample perdictability, Layton (1983) found prima facie statistical evidence to support the notion that US monetary growth may be regarded as a leading indicator of Australian monetary growth. However, that study was bivariate in nature and did not take into consideration the influence on Australian monetary growth of any domestic factors. Using the same causality concept, the present analysis extends this work by conducting the causality testing in the trivariate context, taking explicit account of the influence of domestic income growth in determining Australian monetary growth. The evidence continues to support the earlier finding that US monetary growth is Granger-causal to Australian monetary growth.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In earlier work, using the Granger (1969, 1980) notion of causality couched in terms of post-sample perdictability, Layton (1983) found prima facie statistical evidence to support the notion that US monetary growth may be regarded as a leading indicator of Australian monetary growth. However, that study was bivariate in nature and did not take into consideration the influence on Australian monetary growth of any domestic factors. Using the same causality concept, the present analysis extends this work by conducting the causality testing in the trivariate context, taking explicit account of the influence of domestic income growth in determining Australian monetary growth. The evidence continues to support the earlier finding that US monetary growth is Granger-causal to Australian monetary growth.

Key concepts: Economics, Nexus (standard), Bivariate analysis, Causality (physics), Prima facie, Granger causality, Context (archaeology), Econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A second look at the US-Australian monetary growth causal nexus — Research Paper | ScholarLens