1952Progress of Theoretical PhysicsRequires access

On Lagrangian Formalism

K. Nishijima

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The differences between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms are discussed through the concept of chronological ordering operators thereby keeping close correspondence to Feynman's path integral. Next a method to derive commutation relations without referring to Hamiltonian formalism is presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The differences between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms are discussed through the concept of chronological ordering operators thereby keeping close correspondence to Feynman's path integral. Next a method to derive commutation relations without referring to Hamiltonian formalism is presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The differences between Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms are discussed through the concept of chronological ordering operators thereby keeping close correspondence to Feynman's path integral. Next a method to derive commutation relations without referring to Hamiltonian formalism is presented.

Key concepts: Rotation formalisms in three dimensions, Lagrangian, Formalism (music), Physics, Hamiltonian (control theory), Path integral formulation, Feynman diagram, Covariant Hamiltonian field theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Lagrangian Formalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens