2008•The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

The influence of the feature (sonorant) in lexical access in Spanish

Danny R. Moates, Emilia Alonso Marks, Dario Barrera

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Does the feature (sonorant) influence access to lexical entries? In current feature geometry, the feature (sonorant) is a root node feature, distinguishing resonants from obstruents. Marks, et al. (2002) demonstrated its influence in lexical access using the word reconstruction task in Spanish. Participants heard a nonword, e.g., dirmar, and were asked to change it into a real word (firmar) by changing just one consonant. Errors in recovering the correct word (firmar) were much higher when the word contained an obstruent that had been replaced with a resonant (nirmar) than when the word contained an obstruent that had been replaced by another obstruent (dirmar). Obstruent target words were easier to recover when the target segment and the replacing segment matched on the feature [sonorant]. Why do obstruents show this matching effect? The present study subdivided obstruents into stops and fricatives. Two experiments compared them separately to resonants in the word reconstruction task. Are fricatives alone or stops alone responsible for the observed obstruent effect? Results showed greater errors in the mismatch condition for both fricatives and stops, but significantly greater for fricatives than for stops, suggesting that the mismatch effect observed for obstruents is largely based on fricatives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Does the feature (sonorant) influence access to lexical entries? In current feature geometry, the feature (sonorant) is a root node feature, distinguishing resonants from obstruents. Marks, et al. (2002) demonstrated its influence in lexical access using the word reconstruction task in Spanish. Participants heard a nonword, e.g., dirmar, and were asked to change it into a real word (firmar) by changing just one consonant. Errors in recovering the correct word (firmar) were much higher when the word contained an obstruent that had been replaced with a resonant (nirmar) than when the word contained an obstruent that had been replaced by another obstruent (dirmar). Obstruent target words were easier to recover when the target segment and the replacing segment matched on the feature [sonorant]. Why do obstruents show this matching effect? The present study subdivided obstruents into stops and fricatives. Two experiments compared them separately to resonants in the word reconstruction task. Are fricatives alone or stops alone responsible for the observed obstruent effect? Results showed greater errors in the mismatch condition for both fricatives and stops, but significantly greater for fricatives than for stops, suggesting that the mismatch effect observed for obstruents is largely based on fricatives.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Does the feature (sonorant) influence access to lexical entries? In current feature geometry, the feature (sonorant) is a root node feature, distinguishing resonants from obstruents. Marks, et al. (2002) demonstrated its influence in lexical access using the word reconstruction task in Spanish. Participants heard a nonword, e.g., dirmar, and were asked to change it into a real word (firmar) by changing just one consonant. Errors in recovering the correct word (firmar) were much higher when the word contained an obstruent that had been replaced with a resonant (nirmar) than when the word contained an obstruent that had been replaced by another obstruent (dirmar). Obstruent target words were easier to recover when the target segment and the replacing segment matched on the feature [sonorant]. Why do obstruents show this matching effect? The present study subdivided obstruents into stops and fricatives. Two experiments compared them separately to resonants in the word reconstruction task. Are fricatives alone or stops alone responsible for the observed obstruent effect? Results showed greater errors in the mismatch condition for both fricatives and stops, but significantly greater for fricatives than for stops, suggesting that the mismatch effect observed for obstruents is largely based on fricatives.

Key concepts: Obstruent, Consonant, Feature (linguistics), Speech recognition, Word (group theory), Computer science, Mathematics, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The influence of the feature (sonorant) in lexical access in Spanish — Research Paper | ScholarLens