2002European Journal of ImmunologyOpen access

Differential activation of human and guinea pig complement by pentameric and hexameric IgM

Cathy Collins, Florence W. L. Tsui, Marc J. Shulman

Open full text 64 citations

Abstract

Human and mouse IgM can be polymerized as a hexamer in addition to a pentamer. Our previous work with mouse IgM measured activation of guinea pig complement by highly enriched preparations of hexamer and pentamer and showed that hexamer is >100-fold more active than pentamer. In this report pentamer and hexamer were compared for their capacity to activate complement in a homogeneic system, i.e. chimeric mouse V/human Cmu IgM pentamer and hexamer were assayed separately for their capacity to activate human (and guinea pig) complement. In both the homogeneic and the xenogeneic systems hexamer was more active than pentamer, but the magnitude of the difference between hexamer and pentamer depended on the complement source. Whereas chimeric hexamer activated guinea pig complement >100-fold more efficiently than did chimeric pentamer, this hexamer was only 4-13-fold more active than pentamer when assayed with human complement. Similarly, mouse hexamer, which was >100-fold more active than mouse pentamer with guinea pig complement, was only approximately 2-fold more active than mouse pentamer with human complement. Mouse hexameric and pentameric IgM were each approximately 20-fold more active with human complement than were the corresponding chimeric isoforms of IgM.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Human and mouse IgM can be polymerized as a hexamer in addition to a pentamer. Our previous work with mouse IgM measured activation of guinea pig complement by highly enriched preparations of hexamer and pentamer and showed that hexamer is >100-fold more active than pentamer. In this report pentamer and hexamer were compared for their capacity to activate complement in a homogeneic system, i.e. chimeric mouse V/human Cmu IgM pentamer and hexamer were assayed separately for their capacity to activate human (and guinea pig) complement. In both the homogeneic and the xenogeneic systems hexamer was more active than pentamer, but the magnitude of the difference between hexamer and pentamer depended on the complement source. Whereas chimeric hexamer activated guinea pig complement >100-fold more efficiently than did chimeric pentamer, this hexamer was only 4-13-fold more active than pentamer when assayed with human complement. Similarly, mouse hexamer, which was >100-fold more active than mouse pentamer with guinea pig complement, was only approximately 2-fold more active than mouse pentamer with human complement. Mouse hexameric and pentameric IgM were each approximately 20-fold more active with human complement than were the corresponding chimeric isoforms of IgM.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 64 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Human and mouse IgM can be polymerized as a hexamer in addition to a pentamer. Our previous work with mouse IgM measured activation of guinea pig complement by highly enriched preparations of hexamer and pentamer and showed that hexamer is >100-fold more active than pentamer. In this report pentamer and hexamer were compared for their capacity to activate complement in a homogeneic system, i.e. chimeric mouse V/human Cmu IgM pentamer and hexamer were assayed separately for their capacity to activate human (and guinea pig) complement. In both the homogeneic and the xenogeneic systems hexamer was more active than pentamer, but the magnitude of the difference between hexamer and pentamer depended on the complement source. Whereas chimeric hexamer activated guinea pig complement >100-fold more efficiently than did chimeric pentamer, this hexamer was only 4-13-fold more active than pentamer when assayed with human complement. Similarly, mouse hexamer, which was >100-fold more active than mouse pentamer with guinea pig complement, was only approximately 2-fold more active than mouse pentamer with human complement. Mouse hexameric and pentameric IgM were each approximately 20-fold more active with human complement than were the corresponding chimeric isoforms of IgM.

Key concepts: Random hexamer, Pentamer, Biology, Complement system, Molecular biology, Classical complement pathway, Guinea pig, Antibody

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differential activation of human and guinea pig complement by pentameric and hexameric IgM — Research Paper | ScholarLens