Estimation of Paraproteins by Immunoturbidimetry and Electrophoresis Followed by Scanning Densitometry
David A. Sinclair, Fiona C. Ballantyne, Susan Shanley, Eleanor Caine, Denis StJ O'Reilly, Alan Shenkin
Abstract
David A. Sinclair, Fiona C. Ballantyne, Susan Shanley, Eleanor Caine, Denis StJ O'Reilly, Alan Shenkin
Abstract
A comparison of paraprotein estimation by immunoturbidimetry (IT) and electrophoresis followed by scanning densitometry (EFD) showed significant differences in concentration for IgG, IgA, and IgM paraproteins. Overestimation of IgM paraproteins by IT was particularly marked. Our data suggest that both techniques should be used for IgG and IgA paraproteins but for IgM paraproteins IT was found to be unsuitable and EFD is the method of choice.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A comparison of paraprotein estimation by immunoturbidimetry (IT) and electrophoresis followed by scanning densitometry (EFD) showed significant differences in concentration for IgG, IgA, and IgM paraproteins. Overestimation of IgM paraproteins by IT was particularly marked. Our data suggest that both techniques should be used for IgG and IgA paraproteins but for IgM paraproteins IT was found to be unsuitable and EFD is the method of choice.
Key concepts: Paraproteins, Densitometry, Chemistry, Immunoglobulin A, Nephelometry, Chromatography, Immunology, Medicine