1978•Canadian Geotechnical JournalOpen access

Adfreeze strength of frozen sand to model piles

Veembil Ramachandran Parameswaran

Open full text 66 citations

Abstract

Laboratory measurements of adfreeze strength of Ottawa fine sand to three different types of model piles under constant rates of loading are reported in this paper. Adfreeze strength, [Formula: see text]f, at peak load increased with increasing loading rate (i.e., rate of displacement of cross-head of the testing machine), İ, and followed a power law[Formula: see text]The maximum adfreeze bond strength developed with uncoated wood piles (B.C. fir and spruce). Concrete piles developed adfreeze bond strengths lower than wood but higher than steel and coated piles. Coatings (creosote, paint, etc.) reduced adfreeze bond strength considerably. In decreasing order of adfreeze bond strength, the piles rated as follows: uncoated B.C. fir, uncoated spruce, concrete, unpainted steel cylindrical and H-sections, creosoted B.C. fir, and, finally, painted steel pipe.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Laboratory measurements of adfreeze strength of Ottawa fine sand to three different types of model piles under constant rates of loading are reported in this paper. Adfreeze strength, [Formula: see text]f, at peak load increased with increasing loading rate (i.e., rate of displacement of cross-head of the testing machine), İ, and followed a power law[Formula: see text]The maximum adfreeze bond strength developed with uncoated wood piles (B.C. fir and spruce). Concrete piles developed adfreeze bond strengths lower than wood but higher than steel and coated piles. Coatings (creosote, paint, etc.) reduced adfreeze bond strength considerably. In decreasing order of adfreeze bond strength, the piles rated as follows: uncoated B.C. fir, uncoated spruce, concrete, unpainted steel cylindrical and H-sections, creosoted B.C. fir, and, finally, painted steel pipe.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Laboratory measurements of adfreeze strength of Ottawa fine sand to three different types of model piles under constant rates of loading are reported in this paper. Adfreeze strength, [Formula: see text]f, at peak load increased with increasing loading rate (i.e., rate of displacement of cross-head of the testing machine), İ, and followed a power law[Formula: see text]The maximum adfreeze bond strength developed with uncoated wood piles (B.C. fir and spruce). Concrete piles developed adfreeze bond strengths lower than wood but higher than steel and coated piles. Coatings (creosote, paint, etc.) reduced adfreeze bond strength considerably. In decreasing order of adfreeze bond strength, the piles rated as follows: uncoated B.C. fir, uncoated spruce, concrete, unpainted steel cylindrical and H-sections, creosoted B.C. fir, and, finally, painted steel pipe.

Key concepts: Geotechnical engineering, Bond strength, Displacement (psychology), Head (geology), Structural engineering, Creosote, Materials science, Compressive strength

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Adfreeze strength of frozen sand to model piles — Research Paper | ScholarLens