2009Early Child Development and CareRequires access

Promoting kindergarten children’s creativity in the classroom environment in Jordan

Kholoud Adeeb Al‐Dababneh, Fathi Ihmeideh, Aieman Ahmad Al‐Omari

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating teachers’ classroom practices, which either stimulate or inhibit the development of the creative environment of classrooms in Jordan, and determining the differences between practices according to educational level, experience level and type of teaching. The sample of the study consisted of 215 kindergarten teachers. A five‐dimensional questionnaire consisting of 50 items was developed to achieve the study aims. The results revealed that the rating of teachers’ practices that encourage creativity in children was satisfactory for the domains of physical environment and educational materials, lesson planning and creative instructional practices. In addition, teachers’ rating lies in the category of ‘good’ for the domains of knowledge and awareness of creativity, and creative classroom climate. Moreover, the results showed that there were statistically significant differences due to the type of teaching in favour of the cooperative method, and due to the educational level in favour of postgraduates, while no statistically significant differences were found due to experience level. Based on the findings, appropriate recommendations were suggested.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study aimed at investigating teachers’ classroom practices, which either stimulate or inhibit the development of the creative environment of classrooms in Jordan, and determining the differences between practices according to educational level, experience level and type of teaching. The sample of the study consisted of 215 kindergarten teachers. A five‐dimensional questionnaire consisting of 50 items was developed to achieve the study aims. The results revealed that the rating of teachers’ practices that encourage creativity in children was satisfactory for the domains of physical environment and educational materials, lesson planning and creative instructional practices. In addition, teachers’ rating lies in the category of ‘good’ for the domains of knowledge and awareness of creativity, and creative classroom climate. Moreover, the results showed that there were statistically significant differences due to the type of teaching in favour of the cooperative method, and due to the educational level in favour of postgraduates, while no statistically significant differences were found due to experience level. Based on the findings, appropriate recommendations were suggested.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study aimed at investigating teachers’ classroom practices, which either stimulate or inhibit the development of the creative environment of classrooms in Jordan, and determining the differences between practices according to educational level, experience level and type of teaching. The sample of the study consisted of 215 kindergarten teachers. A five‐dimensional questionnaire consisting of 50 items was developed to achieve the study aims. The results revealed that the rating of teachers’ practices that encourage creativity in children was satisfactory for the domains of physical environment and educational materials, lesson planning and creative instructional practices. In addition, teachers’ rating lies in the category of ‘good’ for the domains of knowledge and awareness of creativity, and creative classroom climate. Moreover, the results showed that there were statistically significant differences due to the type of teaching in favour of the cooperative method, and due to the educational level in favour of postgraduates, while no statistically significant differences were found due to experience level. Based on the findings, appropriate recommendations were suggested.

Key concepts: Creativity, Psychology, Mathematics education, Sample (material), Teaching method, Pedagogy, Social psychology, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Promoting kindergarten children’s creativity in the classroom environment in Jordan — Research Paper | ScholarLens