1979Art JournalRequires access

City and Country in the 1930s: A Study of New Deal Murals in New York

Marlene Park

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The current debate over Federal funding of the arts and humanities revolves around a number of issues which are hardly new: national versus local control, the autonomy of the Federal agencies versus the political control of funds, professionalism versus populism, the Northeastern establishment versus regionalism, and one standard of quality versus artistic pluralism.1 These issues were first raised in the 1930s, when the Federal government became the main patron of the arts. During the New Deal the Treasury Department's Section of Fine Arts maintained the ideals of national control, professionalism, and one standard of quality. The WPA's Federal Art Project had more local control and a more populist and pluralistic spirit. Although scholars have emphasized the dissimilarities in the works of the two projects,2 a consideration of the works of both projects in New York State reveals that a greater distinction lies between the works done in the City and the State rather than between the works done by one project or the other. What emerges is an internationalist vision in the City and a local vision in the State.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current debate over Federal funding of the arts and humanities revolves around a number of issues which are hardly new: national versus local control, the autonomy of the Federal agencies versus the political control of funds, professionalism versus populism, the Northeastern establishment versus regionalism, and one standard of quality versus artistic pluralism.1 These issues were first raised in the 1930s, when the Federal government became the main patron of the arts. During the New Deal the Treasury Department's Section of Fine Arts maintained the ideals of national control, professionalism, and one standard of quality. The WPA's Federal Art Project had more local control and a more populist and pluralistic spirit. Although scholars have emphasized the dissimilarities in the works of the two projects,2 a consideration of the works of both projects in New York State reveals that a greater distinction lies between the works done in the City and the State rather than between the works done by one project or the other. What emerges is an internationalist vision in the City and a local vision in the State.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current debate over Federal funding of the arts and humanities revolves around a number of issues which are hardly new: national versus local control, the autonomy of the Federal agencies versus the political control of funds, professionalism versus populism, the Northeastern establishment versus regionalism, and one standard of quality versus artistic pluralism.1 These issues were first raised in the 1930s, when the Federal government became the main patron of the arts. During the New Deal the Treasury Department's Section of Fine Arts maintained the ideals of national control, professionalism, and one standard of quality. The WPA's Federal Art Project had more local control and a more populist and pluralistic spirit. Although scholars have emphasized the dissimilarities in the works of the two projects,2 a consideration of the works of both projects in New York State reveals that a greater distinction lies between the works done in the City and the State rather than between the works done by one project or the other. What emerges is an internationalist vision in the City and a local vision in the State.

Key concepts: Public administration, Pluralism (philosophy), Regionalism (politics), Politics, The arts, State (computer science), Autonomy, New Deal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
City and Country in the 1930s: A Study of New Deal Murals in New York — Research Paper | ScholarLens