1981•International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials ManagementRequires access

Buyers and Risk

David Farmer

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The case that the industrial buyer is a risk avoider is not difficult to sustain. Every buying organisation, to a greater or lesser degree, demonstrates symptoms of such behaviour every day. Among these symptoms, the most apparent to the observer is the tendency to retain established suppliers even when competitive alternatives are available. Clearly, to take on a new supplier involves some aspect of risk of failure—even if only of a “teething trouble” nature. A second symptom in production organisations is that which is implied in the statement “we must keep the line moving”. One consequence of this is the tendency to maintain raw material and component inventory levels which err on the high side. In flow production situations involving expensive capital equipment, for example, it is reasonably easy to defend such behaviour. As one Materials Manager put it: “If I stop the line for one hour it costs this company £x,000. There would need to be remarkable cost savings to interest me in changing our present level of stocks or our major suppliers”. Another symptom is a tendency to over‐specify, or to pay “a little more” to ensure that the supplier performs within the required parameters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The case that the industrial buyer is a risk avoider is not difficult to sustain. Every buying organisation, to a greater or lesser degree, demonstrates symptoms of such behaviour every day. Among these symptoms, the most apparent to the observer is the tendency to retain established suppliers even when competitive alternatives are available. Clearly, to take on a new supplier involves some aspect of risk of failure—even if only of a “teething trouble” nature. A second symptom in production organisations is that which is implied in the statement “we must keep the line moving”. One consequence of this is the tendency to maintain raw material and component inventory levels which err on the high side. In flow production situations involving expensive capital equipment, for example, it is reasonably easy to defend such behaviour. As one Materials Manager put it: “If I stop the line for one hour it costs this company £x,000. There would need to be remarkable cost savings to interest me in changing our present level of stocks or our major suppliers”. Another symptom is a tendency to over‐specify, or to pay “a little more” to ensure that the supplier performs within the required parameters.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The case that the industrial buyer is a risk avoider is not difficult to sustain. Every buying organisation, to a greater or lesser degree, demonstrates symptoms of such behaviour every day. Among these symptoms, the most apparent to the observer is the tendency to retain established suppliers even when competitive alternatives are available. Clearly, to take on a new supplier involves some aspect of risk of failure—even if only of a “teething trouble” nature. A second symptom in production organisations is that which is implied in the statement “we must keep the line moving”. One consequence of this is the tendency to maintain raw material and component inventory levels which err on the high side. In flow production situations involving expensive capital equipment, for example, it is reasonably easy to defend such behaviour. As one Materials Manager put it: “If I stop the line for one hour it costs this company £x,000. There would need to be remarkable cost savings to interest me in changing our present level of stocks or our major suppliers”. Another symptom is a tendency to over‐specify, or to pay “a little more” to ensure that the supplier performs within the required parameters.

Key concepts: Business, Production (economics), Capital (architecture), Operations management, Statement (logic), Industrial organization, Risk analysis (engineering), Marketing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Buyers and Risk — Research Paper | ScholarLens