2011International Journal of Project Organisation and ManagementRequires access

Risk and error in IS/IT projects: going beyond process

Elmar Kutsch, Harvey Maylor

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of qualitative project risk management processes as used in IS/IT projects. Risk management is widely identified as one of the key processes within project management, and previous empirical evidence, combined with high levels of project failure, has questioned whether the prevailing approaches to managing project risks are indeed effective. The research problem of investigating the extent to which project managers over- and underestimate risks and the causes for misestimating risks was empirically investigated in the context of IT/IS projects within organisations such as computer service providers (CSPs). The results from studying IS/IT projects show that managers consistently both over- and underestimate risk and that even when a risk is identified, there are behavioural modifiers that intervene in the effective management of these risks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of qualitative project risk management processes as used in IS/IT projects. Risk management is widely identified as one of the key processes within project management, and previous empirical evidence, combined with high levels of project failure, has questioned whether the prevailing approaches to managing project risks are indeed effective. The research problem of investigating the extent to which project managers over- and underestimate risks and the causes for misestimating risks was empirically investigated in the context of IT/IS projects within organisations such as computer service providers (CSPs). The results from studying IS/IT projects show that managers consistently both over- and underestimate risk and that even when a risk is identified, there are behavioural modifiers that intervene in the effective management of these risks.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of qualitative project risk management processes as used in IS/IT projects. Risk management is widely identified as one of the key processes within project management, and previous empirical evidence, combined with high levels of project failure, has questioned whether the prevailing approaches to managing project risks are indeed effective. The research problem of investigating the extent to which project managers over- and underestimate risks and the causes for misestimating risks was empirically investigated in the context of IT/IS projects within organisations such as computer service providers (CSPs). The results from studying IS/IT projects show that managers consistently both over- and underestimate risk and that even when a risk is identified, there are behavioural modifiers that intervene in the effective management of these risks.

Key concepts: Risk management, Project risk management, Project management, Risk analysis (engineering), Risk management plan, Business, Extreme project management, Project management triangle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Risk and error in IS/IT projects: going beyond process — Research Paper | ScholarLens