2013Reconstructive ReviewOpen access

Range of Motion In High Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty vs. Standard Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized Study

George N. Guild, Sameh A. Labib

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Range of motion after knee replacement is an important factor in overall outcome. The purpose was to compare motion in patients receiving high flexion prosthesis vs. standard prosthesis. 24 high flexion and standard knee prostheses were used. Patients were followed for two years and evaluated prospectively. The mean HSS was 80.4 for the standard group and 80.7 for the flexion group. At two year follow up the standard prosthesis group had mean flexion of 113°. The high flexion prosthesis group had mean flexion 106°. No knee had aseptic loosening, infection, or osteolysis. At two year follow up, there were no significant differences between groups with regard to range of motion, clinical outcome, or radiographic evaluation.Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, high flexion, range of motion

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Range of motion after knee replacement is an important factor in overall outcome. The purpose was to compare motion in patients receiving high flexion prosthesis vs. standard prosthesis. 24 high flexion and standard knee prostheses were used. Patients were followed for two years and evaluated prospectively. The mean HSS was 80.4 for the standard group and 80.7 for the flexion group. At two year follow up the standard prosthesis group had mean flexion of 113°. The high flexion prosthesis group had mean flexion 106°. No knee had aseptic loosening, infection, or osteolysis. At two year follow up, there were no significant differences between groups with regard to range of motion, clinical outcome, or radiographic evaluation.Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, high flexion, range of motion

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Range of motion after knee replacement is an important factor in overall outcome. The purpose was to compare motion in patients receiving high flexion prosthesis vs. standard prosthesis. 24 high flexion and standard knee prostheses were used. Patients were followed for two years and evaluated prospectively. The mean HSS was 80.4 for the standard group and 80.7 for the flexion group. At two year follow up the standard prosthesis group had mean flexion of 113°. The high flexion prosthesis group had mean flexion 106°. No knee had aseptic loosening, infection, or osteolysis. At two year follow up, there were no significant differences between groups with regard to range of motion, clinical outcome, or radiographic evaluation.Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, high flexion, range of motion

Key concepts: Range of motion, Prosthesis, Medicine, Arthroplasty, Total knee arthroplasty, Knee flexion, Radiography, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Range of Motion In High Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty vs. Standard Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens