2001Journal of Public Policy & MarketingRequires access

Copyright Policies and Issues Raised byA&M Records v. Napster: “The Shot Heard ‘Round the World” or “Not with a Bang but a Whimper?”

Jeff Langenderfer, Don Lloyd Cook

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the case of A&M Records v. Napster (2001a) represented a resounding legal victory for the record companies over the largest of the Internet music exchange services. Napster’s ultimate survival is uncertain at best, but the key for the record industry is not Napster’s eventual life or death per se. Rather, final victory will be determined by whether the music industry can parlay its legal triumph over Napster into any real control of the music piracy that still thrives on the Internet, threatening to alter intellectual property exchange permanently. In this paper, the authors analyze the legal arguments related to Internet digital music transfer and the future of the music industry in light of the current legal and technological environment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the case of A&M Records v. Napster (2001a) represented a resounding legal victory for the record companies over the largest of the Internet music exchange services. Napster’s ultimate survival is uncertain at best, but the key for the record industry is not Napster’s eventual life or death per se. Rather, final victory will be determined by whether the music industry can parlay its legal triumph over Napster into any real control of the music piracy that still thrives on the Internet, threatening to alter intellectual property exchange permanently. In this paper, the authors analyze the legal arguments related to Internet digital music transfer and the future of the music industry in light of the current legal and technological environment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the case of A&M Records v. Napster (2001a) represented a resounding legal victory for the record companies over the largest of the Internet music exchange services. Napster’s ultimate survival is uncertain at best, but the key for the record industry is not Napster’s eventual life or death per se. Rather, final victory will be determined by whether the music industry can parlay its legal triumph over Napster into any real control of the music piracy that still thrives on the Internet, threatening to alter intellectual property exchange permanently. In this paper, the authors analyze the legal arguments related to Internet digital music transfer and the future of the music industry in light of the current legal and technological environment.

Key concepts: Shot (pellet), Political science, Chemistry, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Copyright Policies and Issues Raised byA&M Records v. Napster: “The Shot Heard ‘Round the World” or “Not with a Bang but a Whimper?” — Research Paper | ScholarLens