1990Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaRequires access

The respiratory effects of reversing midazolarn sedation with flumazenil in the presence or absence of narcotics

A. Weinbrum, E. Geller

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of reversal of sedation with flumazenil (F), in the presence or absence of opiates, on arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2). Twenty-four patients undergoing surgery and epidural anaesthesia were studied. Twelve patients (Group A) were orally premedicated with diazepam and 0.1 mg.kg-1 morphine i.m. Intraoperative sedation consisted of midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 and pethidine 0.7 mg.kg-1 i.v. Twelve patients (Group B) were premedicated with diazepam and sedated intraoperatively with 0.1 mg.kg-1 midazolam. In the recovery room, six patients in each group were randomly allocated to receive 1 mg of flumazenil while the others were allowed to awaken spontaneously (control). Sedation (eyes open vs closed), SaO2, ETCO2, respiratory rate, blood pressure and pulse were non-invasively monitored for 90 min. Administration of flumazenil resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of patients with eyes open in both groups at 5 min, lasting 15 min in Group A and 30 min in Group B patients. An increase in SaO2 from 15-45 min after injection of flumazenil was observed only in Group B. No significant difference between groups in any other parameter was found. We concluded that reversal of benzodiazepine (BZ) sedation with flumazenil improved SaO2 in patients sedated with only BZ; in the presence of BZ and opiates, flumazenil did not affect respiratory parameters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of reversal of sedation with flumazenil (F), in the presence or absence of opiates, on arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2). Twenty-four patients undergoing surgery and epidural anaesthesia were studied. Twelve patients (Group A) were orally premedicated with diazepam and 0.1 mg.kg-1 morphine i.m. Intraoperative sedation consisted of midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 and pethidine 0.7 mg.kg-1 i.v. Twelve patients (Group B) were premedicated with diazepam and sedated intraoperatively with 0.1 mg.kg-1 midazolam. In the recovery room, six patients in each group were randomly allocated to receive 1 mg of flumazenil while the others were allowed to awaken spontaneously (control). Sedation (eyes open vs closed), SaO2, ETCO2, respiratory rate, blood pressure and pulse were non-invasively monitored for 90 min. Administration of flumazenil resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of patients with eyes open in both groups at 5 min, lasting 15 min in Group A and 30 min in Group B patients. An increase in SaO2 from 15-45 min after injection of flumazenil was observed only in Group B. No significant difference between groups in any other parameter was found. We concluded that reversal of benzodiazepine (BZ) sedation with flumazenil improved SaO2 in patients sedated with only BZ; in the presence of BZ and opiates, flumazenil did not affect respiratory parameters.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of reversal of sedation with flumazenil (F), in the presence or absence of opiates, on arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2). Twenty-four patients undergoing surgery and epidural anaesthesia were studied. Twelve patients (Group A) were orally premedicated with diazepam and 0.1 mg.kg-1 morphine i.m. Intraoperative sedation consisted of midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 and pethidine 0.7 mg.kg-1 i.v. Twelve patients (Group B) were premedicated with diazepam and sedated intraoperatively with 0.1 mg.kg-1 midazolam. In the recovery room, six patients in each group were randomly allocated to receive 1 mg of flumazenil while the others were allowed to awaken spontaneously (control). Sedation (eyes open vs closed), SaO2, ETCO2, respiratory rate, blood pressure and pulse were non-invasively monitored for 90 min. Administration of flumazenil resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of patients with eyes open in both groups at 5 min, lasting 15 min in Group A and 30 min in Group B patients. An increase in SaO2 from 15-45 min after injection of flumazenil was observed only in Group B. No significant difference between groups in any other parameter was found. We concluded that reversal of benzodiazepine (BZ) sedation with flumazenil improved SaO2 in patients sedated with only BZ; in the presence of BZ and opiates, flumazenil did not affect respiratory parameters.

Key concepts: Flumazenil, Medicine, Midazolam, Sedation, Anesthesia, Pethidine, Diazepam, Respiratory rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The respiratory effects of reversing midazolarn sedation with flumazenil in the presence or absence of narcotics — Research Paper | ScholarLens