2013Procedia - Social and Behavioral SciencesOpen access

The History of Philosophy as Reconstruction

Claudiu Mesaroş

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

I start from several observations on how the Historiography of Philosophy has been seen since the 1980s when Richard Rorty provoked several important philosophers to take position. I note that one significant related problem is that of the addressability of philosophy for it is directly consistent with the History of Philosophy as a discourse. I discuss the problem of the audience of philosophy as part of the historiographical investigation in philosophy, considering the audience as intrinsic to the philosopher's project. Then I rely on theoretical backgrounds such as Passmore and Gracia to introduce the specific of narrating philosophy as performative and interpretative act, therefore the History of Philosophy as reconstruction. My conclusion based on such is that the History of Philosophy is an actualization of as many possible counter-parts philosophical texts have in audiences’ minds.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I start from several observations on how the Historiography of Philosophy has been seen since the 1980s when Richard Rorty provoked several important philosophers to take position. I note that one significant related problem is that of the addressability of philosophy for it is directly consistent with the History of Philosophy as a discourse. I discuss the problem of the audience of philosophy as part of the historiographical investigation in philosophy, considering the audience as intrinsic to the philosopher's project. Then I rely on theoretical backgrounds such as Passmore and Gracia to introduce the specific of narrating philosophy as performative and interpretative act, therefore the History of Philosophy as reconstruction. My conclusion based on such is that the History of Philosophy is an actualization of as many possible counter-parts philosophical texts have in audiences’ minds.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I start from several observations on how the Historiography of Philosophy has been seen since the 1980s when Richard Rorty provoked several important philosophers to take position. I note that one significant related problem is that of the addressability of philosophy for it is directly consistent with the History of Philosophy as a discourse. I discuss the problem of the audience of philosophy as part of the historiographical investigation in philosophy, considering the audience as intrinsic to the philosopher's project. Then I rely on theoretical backgrounds such as Passmore and Gracia to introduce the specific of narrating philosophy as performative and interpretative act, therefore the History of Philosophy as reconstruction. My conclusion based on such is that the History of Philosophy is an actualization of as many possible counter-parts philosophical texts have in audiences’ minds.

Key concepts: Historiography, Performative utterance, Epistemology, Metaphilosophy, Philosophy education, Western philosophy, Philosophy of computer science, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The History of Philosophy as Reconstruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens