1997Communication MonographsRequires access

Verbal adaptive strategies in U.S. American dyadic interactions with U.S. American or East‐Asian partners

Ling Chen

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

This study explored verbal adaptive strategies that communicators employ for mutual orientation and management of role relationship in dyadic conversations. “Get‐to‐know‐each‐other” dyadic conversation data were collected in a lab situation involving Americans communicating with other Americans (A‐A) or with East‐Asian (A‐E) partners who were nonnative speakers of English. The study focused on verbal adaptive strategies in alignment talk and was designed to determine whether there are differences or similarities between intercultural and intracultural communicators in the use of these strategies. Also examined were the extent of interaction involvement in the A‐A/A‐E dyads and the relationship between use of adaptive strategies and the extent of interaction involvement. The dyad types were differentiated by significantly different levels of interaction involvement, by different amounts of alignment talk, by different patterns of alignment talk, and by differences in use of five of seven alignment strategies. Correlations between use of various alignment strategies and measurement of interaction involvement were found.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study explored verbal adaptive strategies that communicators employ for mutual orientation and management of role relationship in dyadic conversations. “Get‐to‐know‐each‐other” dyadic conversation data were collected in a lab situation involving Americans communicating with other Americans (A‐A) or with East‐Asian (A‐E) partners who were nonnative speakers of English. The study focused on verbal adaptive strategies in alignment talk and was designed to determine whether there are differences or similarities between intercultural and intracultural communicators in the use of these strategies. Also examined were the extent of interaction involvement in the A‐A/A‐E dyads and the relationship between use of adaptive strategies and the extent of interaction involvement. The dyad types were differentiated by significantly different levels of interaction involvement, by different amounts of alignment talk, by different patterns of alignment talk, and by differences in use of five of seven alignment strategies. Correlations between use of various alignment strategies and measurement of interaction involvement were found.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study explored verbal adaptive strategies that communicators employ for mutual orientation and management of role relationship in dyadic conversations. “Get‐to‐know‐each‐other” dyadic conversation data were collected in a lab situation involving Americans communicating with other Americans (A‐A) or with East‐Asian (A‐E) partners who were nonnative speakers of English. The study focused on verbal adaptive strategies in alignment talk and was designed to determine whether there are differences or similarities between intercultural and intracultural communicators in the use of these strategies. Also examined were the extent of interaction involvement in the A‐A/A‐E dyads and the relationship between use of adaptive strategies and the extent of interaction involvement. The dyad types were differentiated by significantly different levels of interaction involvement, by different amounts of alignment talk, by different patterns of alignment talk, and by differences in use of five of seven alignment strategies. Correlations between use of various alignment strategies and measurement of interaction involvement were found.

Key concepts: Dyad, Psychology, Conversation, Interpersonal interaction, Nonverbal communication, Orientation (vector space), Interpersonal communication, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Verbal adaptive strategies in U.S. American dyadic interactions with U.S. American or East‐Asian partners — Research Paper | ScholarLens