1974Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyRequires access

Development of the epiphyllous inflorescence of Phyllonoma integerrima (Turcz.) Loes.: implications for comparative morphology*

Timothy A. Dickinson, Rolf Sattler

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

The inflorescence primordium of Phyllonoma integerrima (Turcz.) Loes. is initiated on the adaxial side of the leaf primordium. At about the same time, a vegetative bud is formed at the base of the same leaf primordium. The vascular anatomy is the same in the fertile and sterile leaves, except that in the fertile leaf an inflorescence trace departs from the midvein of the leaf at the point where the inflorescence is inserted. Neither the inception nor the procambial supply of the inflorescence provide evidence of “congenital fusion” of inflorescence and leaf. It is also argued that the idea of an “adventitious” origin of the inflorescence is not useful in this case. Consequences for our conception of shoot construction are pointed out. It is argued that positional changes in the initiation of organs is an evolutionary process that may have remarkable effects on plant construction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The inflorescence primordium of Phyllonoma integerrima (Turcz.) Loes. is initiated on the adaxial side of the leaf primordium. At about the same time, a vegetative bud is formed at the base of the same leaf primordium. The vascular anatomy is the same in the fertile and sterile leaves, except that in the fertile leaf an inflorescence trace departs from the midvein of the leaf at the point where the inflorescence is inserted. Neither the inception nor the procambial supply of the inflorescence provide evidence of “congenital fusion” of inflorescence and leaf. It is also argued that the idea of an “adventitious” origin of the inflorescence is not useful in this case. Consequences for our conception of shoot construction are pointed out. It is argued that positional changes in the initiation of organs is an evolutionary process that may have remarkable effects on plant construction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The inflorescence primordium of Phyllonoma integerrima (Turcz.) Loes. is initiated on the adaxial side of the leaf primordium. At about the same time, a vegetative bud is formed at the base of the same leaf primordium. The vascular anatomy is the same in the fertile and sterile leaves, except that in the fertile leaf an inflorescence trace departs from the midvein of the leaf at the point where the inflorescence is inserted. Neither the inception nor the procambial supply of the inflorescence provide evidence of “congenital fusion” of inflorescence and leaf. It is also argued that the idea of an “adventitious” origin of the inflorescence is not useful in this case. Consequences for our conception of shoot construction are pointed out. It is argued that positional changes in the initiation of organs is an evolutionary process that may have remarkable effects on plant construction.

Key concepts: Inflorescence, Primordium, Biology, Phyllotaxis, Botany, Apex (geometry), Shoot, Meristem

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of the epiphyllous inflorescence of Phyllonoma integerrima (Turcz.) Loes.: implications for comparative morphology* — Research Paper | ScholarLens