2008Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Multimodal Level of Service for Urban Streets

Richard Dowling, Aimee Flannery, Bruce W. Landis, Theo Petritsch, Nagui M. Rouphail, Paul Ryus

Open publisher page 80 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the results of research to develop a national method for the multimodal assessment of the quality of service provided by an urban street. The method considers the level of service from the point of view of four types of travelers typically using the urban street: auto driver, transit passenger, bicycle rider, and pedestrian. Video laboratories and transit onboard surveys were used to develop data sets of the quality of service perceived by the general public for each of the modes of travel on the urban street. The laboratories were conducted in several different metropolitan areas of the United States. Four level-of-service (LOS) models were developed, one for each mode. The four LOS models share a common measure, user satisfaction. The models assign a letter grade LOS (A–F) based on the street cross section, intersection controls, and traffic characteristics (auto, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian volumes on the street). The models can be used in combination to compare the trade-offs of different street cross sections from the unique perspectives of each mode. The models are particularly useful for testing the impacts of converting auto through lanes to bicycle lanes, wider sidewalks, and wider planter strips.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents the results of research to develop a national method for the multimodal assessment of the quality of service provided by an urban street. The method considers the level of service from the point of view of four types of travelers typically using the urban street: auto driver, transit passenger, bicycle rider, and pedestrian. Video laboratories and transit onboard surveys were used to develop data sets of the quality of service perceived by the general public for each of the modes of travel on the urban street. The laboratories were conducted in several different metropolitan areas of the United States. Four level-of-service (LOS) models were developed, one for each mode. The four LOS models share a common measure, user satisfaction. The models assign a letter grade LOS (A–F) based on the street cross section, intersection controls, and traffic characteristics (auto, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian volumes on the street). The models can be used in combination to compare the trade-offs of different street cross sections from the unique perspectives of each mode. The models are particularly useful for testing the impacts of converting auto through lanes to bicycle lanes, wider sidewalks, and wider planter strips.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 80 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents the results of research to develop a national method for the multimodal assessment of the quality of service provided by an urban street. The method considers the level of service from the point of view of four types of travelers typically using the urban street: auto driver, transit passenger, bicycle rider, and pedestrian. Video laboratories and transit onboard surveys were used to develop data sets of the quality of service perceived by the general public for each of the modes of travel on the urban street. The laboratories were conducted in several different metropolitan areas of the United States. Four level-of-service (LOS) models were developed, one for each mode. The four LOS models share a common measure, user satisfaction. The models assign a letter grade LOS (A–F) based on the street cross section, intersection controls, and traffic characteristics (auto, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian volumes on the street). The models can be used in combination to compare the trade-offs of different street cross sections from the unique perspectives of each mode. The models are particularly useful for testing the impacts of converting auto through lanes to bicycle lanes, wider sidewalks, and wider planter strips.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Metropolitan area, Pedestrian, Intersection (aeronautics), Public transport, Level of service, Service (business), Walkability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multimodal Level of Service for Urban Streets — Research Paper | ScholarLens