2011•Medical PhysicsRequires access

Measurements of multidetector CT surface dose distributions using a film dosimeter and chest phantom

Masahide Tominaga, Yoshiki Kawata, Noboru Niki, Noriyuki Moriyama, Kenji Yamada, Junji Ueno, Hiromu Nishitani

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper uses film dosimetry to investigate the relationship between multiple scan parameters of multidetector CT with automatic exposure control (AEC) and the surface dose distribution produced on a chest phantom. METHODS: The characteristics of the film used in the film dosimeter were evaluated with regard to linearity, relative film response, and directional dependence. Measurements with an ionization chamber dosimeter and a water phantom were used to evaluate the accuracy of the film dosimeter measurements and to validate the dose profile measurements while changing the tube current, detector dimensions and pitch. When using AEC, the surface dose distribution on the chest phantom was analyzed while changing the detector dimensions and pitch. RESULTS: The linearity, relative film response, and directional dependence of the film were established. The measurement difference between the film dosimeter and ionization chamber dosimeter was within +/- 5% and the dose profile measurement results were validated. It was found that the surface dose distribution changed helically in the direction of the body axis depending on the scan parameters and the phantom. CONCLUSIONS: Using a film dosimeter, the relationship between various multidetector CT scan parameters and the surface dose distribution on a chest phantom was investigated and clarified.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: This paper uses film dosimetry to investigate the relationship between multiple scan parameters of multidetector CT with automatic exposure control (AEC) and the surface dose distribution produced on a chest phantom. METHODS: The characteristics of the film used in the film dosimeter were evaluated with regard to linearity, relative film response, and directional dependence. Measurements with an ionization chamber dosimeter and a water phantom were used to evaluate the accuracy of the film dosimeter measurements and to validate the dose profile measurements while changing the tube current, detector dimensions and pitch. When using AEC, the surface dose distribution on the chest phantom was analyzed while changing the detector dimensions and pitch. RESULTS: The linearity, relative film response, and directional dependence of the film were established. The measurement difference between the film dosimeter and ionization chamber dosimeter was within +/- 5% and the dose profile measurement results were validated. It was found that the surface dose distribution changed helically in the direction of the body axis depending on the scan parameters and the phantom. CONCLUSIONS: Using a film dosimeter, the relationship between various multidetector CT scan parameters and the surface dose distribution on a chest phantom was investigated and clarified.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: This paper uses film dosimetry to investigate the relationship between multiple scan parameters of multidetector CT with automatic exposure control (AEC) and the surface dose distribution produced on a chest phantom. METHODS: The characteristics of the film used in the film dosimeter were evaluated with regard to linearity, relative film response, and directional dependence. Measurements with an ionization chamber dosimeter and a water phantom were used to evaluate the accuracy of the film dosimeter measurements and to validate the dose profile measurements while changing the tube current, detector dimensions and pitch. When using AEC, the surface dose distribution on the chest phantom was analyzed while changing the detector dimensions and pitch. RESULTS: The linearity, relative film response, and directional dependence of the film were established. The measurement difference between the film dosimeter and ionization chamber dosimeter was within +/- 5% and the dose profile measurement results were validated. It was found that the surface dose distribution changed helically in the direction of the body axis depending on the scan parameters and the phantom. CONCLUSIONS: Using a film dosimeter, the relationship between various multidetector CT scan parameters and the surface dose distribution on a chest phantom was investigated and clarified.

Key concepts: Dosimeter, Imaging phantom, Dosimetry, Ionization chamber, Materials science, Dose profile, Nuclear medicine, Detector

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurements of multidetector CT surface dose distributions using a film dosimeter and chest phantom — Research Paper | ScholarLens