Configuration of Corneal Trephine Opening Using Five Different Trephines in Human Donor Eyes
Gabriël van Rij, George O. Waring
Abstract
Gabriël van Rij, George O. Waring
Abstract
In this laboratory study, we used five different corneal trephines on 60 fresh human donor eyes with controlled intraocular pressure to study the variation in the size and shape of the trephine openings. With all trephines, the average diameter of the button was larger than the diameter of the trephine at the epithelial side (mean difference, 0.21 mm; range, 0.06 to 0.35 mm) and the endothelial side (mean difference, 0.42 mm; range, 0.13 to 0.79 mm), presumably because the corneal tissue protruded into the trephine during cutting. The trephines that produced the most uniform opening were a nondisposable suction trephine and a freestanding disposable blade, but they caused some undercutting.
OpenAlex reports 75 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this laboratory study, we used five different corneal trephines on 60 fresh human donor eyes with controlled intraocular pressure to study the variation in the size and shape of the trephine openings. With all trephines, the average diameter of the button was larger than the diameter of the trephine at the epithelial side (mean difference, 0.21 mm; range, 0.06 to 0.35 mm) and the endothelial side (mean difference, 0.42 mm; range, 0.13 to 0.79 mm), presumably because the corneal tissue protruded into the trephine during cutting. The trephines that produced the most uniform opening were a nondisposable suction trephine and a freestanding disposable blade, but they caused some undercutting.
Key concepts: Trephine, Ophthalmology, Significant difference, Medicine, Surgery, Internal medicine