1978•Acta Pharmacologica et ToxicologicaRequires access

Serum Levels and Electrophysiological Effects of N‐Acetylprocainamide as Compared with Procainamide in the Dog Heartin situ

Jan Amlie, Ola Alfred Nesje, Karin Frislid, P. K. M. Lunde, Knud H. Landmark

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

The electrophysiological effects of procainamide and its major metabolite N-acetylprocainamide were tested and compared on the heart of the anaesthetized dog by means of His bundle electrography and programmed electrical stimulation. Both drugs exerted a negative chromotropic effect. They also increased intra-atrial and intraventricular conduction times; procainamide was, however, the more potent of the two drugs. In contrast to procainamide, N-caetylprocainamide did not increase His-Purkinje and atrioventricular nodal conduction times, and at the lowest dose employed, atrioventricular nodal conduction times were decreased during atrial pacing. Both drugs increased the functional and effective refractory period of the right atrium and ventricle. N-acetylprocainamide increased the functional refractory period of the atrioventricular node, but to a lesser extent than procainamide.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The electrophysiological effects of procainamide and its major metabolite N-acetylprocainamide were tested and compared on the heart of the anaesthetized dog by means of His bundle electrography and programmed electrical stimulation. Both drugs exerted a negative chromotropic effect. They also increased intra-atrial and intraventricular conduction times; procainamide was, however, the more potent of the two drugs. In contrast to procainamide, N-caetylprocainamide did not increase His-Purkinje and atrioventricular nodal conduction times, and at the lowest dose employed, atrioventricular nodal conduction times were decreased during atrial pacing. Both drugs increased the functional and effective refractory period of the right atrium and ventricle. N-acetylprocainamide increased the functional refractory period of the atrioventricular node, but to a lesser extent than procainamide.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The electrophysiological effects of procainamide and its major metabolite N-acetylprocainamide were tested and compared on the heart of the anaesthetized dog by means of His bundle electrography and programmed electrical stimulation. Both drugs exerted a negative chromotropic effect. They also increased intra-atrial and intraventricular conduction times; procainamide was, however, the more potent of the two drugs. In contrast to procainamide, N-caetylprocainamide did not increase His-Purkinje and atrioventricular nodal conduction times, and at the lowest dose employed, atrioventricular nodal conduction times were decreased during atrial pacing. Both drugs increased the functional and effective refractory period of the right atrium and ventricle. N-acetylprocainamide increased the functional refractory period of the atrioventricular node, but to a lesser extent than procainamide.

Key concepts: Procainamide, Refractory period, Effective refractory period, Ventricle, Electrophysiology, Atrioventricular node, Internal medicine, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Serum Levels and Electrophysiological Effects of N‐Acetylprocainamide as Compared with Procainamide in the Dog Heartin situ — Research Paper | ScholarLens