ERYTHEMA NODOSUM VERSUS NODULAR VASCULITIS
MARIA‐DOLORES SANZ VICO, Víctor de Diego, E. Sánchez Yus
Abstract
MARIA‐DOLORES SANZ VICO, Víctor de Diego, E. Sánchez Yus
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erythema nodosum (EN) is usually considered to be a septal panniculitis, and nodular vasculitis (NV) a lobular panniculitis. We tested the usefulness of this histologic classification in clarifying a frequent clinical dilemma: EN versus NV. METHODS: Over 3 years 109 patients with panniculitis were included in this study. After a history and a physical examination, a clinical diagnosis was made according to well-established criteria. RESULTS: From the study of 88 patients, we concluded that in the clinically typical cases, the clinico-pathologic agreement was 93% and 94% for EN and NV respectively, whereas it diminished to 79%, 72%, and 67% in the cases clinically diagnosed as EN migrans, atypical EN, and atypical NV, respectively. Moreover, septal and lobular panniculitis were always two clear-cut, different, opposite patterns of hypodermal inflammation to these conditions. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of a known pathogenetic mechanism, the histopathology remains the most objective discriminating marker between EN and NV, mainly in the clinically atypical and doubtful cases.
OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: Erythema nodosum (EN) is usually considered to be a septal panniculitis, and nodular vasculitis (NV) a lobular panniculitis. We tested the usefulness of this histologic classification in clarifying a frequent clinical dilemma: EN versus NV. METHODS: Over 3 years 109 patients with panniculitis were included in this study. After a history and a physical examination, a clinical diagnosis was made according to well-established criteria. RESULTS: From the study of 88 patients, we concluded that in the clinically typical cases, the clinico-pathologic agreement was 93% and 94% for EN and NV respectively, whereas it diminished to 79%, 72%, and 67% in the cases clinically diagnosed as EN migrans, atypical EN, and atypical NV, respectively. Moreover, septal and lobular panniculitis were always two clear-cut, different, opposite patterns of hypodermal inflammation to these conditions. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of a known pathogenetic mechanism, the histopathology remains the most objective discriminating marker between EN and NV, mainly in the clinically atypical and doubtful cases.
Key concepts: Medicine, Panniculitis, Erythema nodosum, Histopathology, Vasculitis, Dermatology, Pathology, Erythema