1981•Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchRequires access

Effect of Noise and Reverberation on Binaural and Monaural Word Identification by Subjects with Various Audiograms

Anna K. Nábělek, David Mason

Open publisher page 118 citations

Abstract

The Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) (Bell, Kreul, + Nixon, 1972; Kreul, Nixon, Kryter, Bell, Land, + Schubert, 1968) was used to test the word-identification ability of subjects with bilateral sensorineural hearing losses. The subjects were tested in a room with reverberation times, T, of .1 and .5 sec while listening monaurally, binaurally, aided, and unaided at various speech-to-noise ratios, S/N. A babble of 20 voices was used as a masker. Significant individual differences were found in a group of 15 subjects with various audiograms. The differences were not significant when a group was reduced to seven subjects with similar audiograms. The advantage of the binaural over monaural listening was significant and did not depend on reverberation or the use of hearing aids. Both the effects of S/N and T were significant. The effects on word-identification scores caused by a decrease in S/N from "quite" to +5 dB and by an increase in T from .1 sec to .5 sec were moderately correlated for individuals. There were individual differences in susceptibility to noise and reverberation, with subjects having asymmetrical audiograms being most susceptible. The analysis of consonant errors in noise or reverberation revealed no significant difference for the MRT. A significant difference emerged between consonant errors in the initial and final positions of the test words in both noise and reverberation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) (Bell, Kreul, + Nixon, 1972; Kreul, Nixon, Kryter, Bell, Land, + Schubert, 1968) was used to test the word-identification ability of subjects with bilateral sensorineural hearing losses. The subjects were tested in a room with reverberation times, T, of .1 and .5 sec while listening monaurally, binaurally, aided, and unaided at various speech-to-noise ratios, S/N. A babble of 20 voices was used as a masker. Significant individual differences were found in a group of 15 subjects with various audiograms. The differences were not significant when a group was reduced to seven subjects with similar audiograms. The advantage of the binaural over monaural listening was significant and did not depend on reverberation or the use of hearing aids. Both the effects of S/N and T were significant. The effects on word-identification scores caused by a decrease in S/N from "quite" to +5 dB and by an increase in T from .1 sec to .5 sec were moderately correlated for individuals. There were individual differences in susceptibility to noise and reverberation, with subjects having asymmetrical audiograms being most susceptible. The analysis of consonant errors in noise or reverberation revealed no significant difference for the MRT. A significant difference emerged between consonant errors in the initial and final positions of the test words in both noise and reverberation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 118 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) (Bell, Kreul, + Nixon, 1972; Kreul, Nixon, Kryter, Bell, Land, + Schubert, 1968) was used to test the word-identification ability of subjects with bilateral sensorineural hearing losses. The subjects were tested in a room with reverberation times, T, of .1 and .5 sec while listening monaurally, binaurally, aided, and unaided at various speech-to-noise ratios, S/N. A babble of 20 voices was used as a masker. Significant individual differences were found in a group of 15 subjects with various audiograms. The differences were not significant when a group was reduced to seven subjects with similar audiograms. The advantage of the binaural over monaural listening was significant and did not depend on reverberation or the use of hearing aids. Both the effects of S/N and T were significant. The effects on word-identification scores caused by a decrease in S/N from "quite" to +5 dB and by an increase in T from .1 sec to .5 sec were moderately correlated for individuals. There were individual differences in susceptibility to noise and reverberation, with subjects having asymmetrical audiograms being most susceptible. The analysis of consonant errors in noise or reverberation revealed no significant difference for the MRT. A significant difference emerged between consonant errors in the initial and final positions of the test words in both noise and reverberation.

Key concepts: Monaural, Audiogram, Audiology, Binaural recording, Active listening, Noise (video), Word identification, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Noise and Reverberation on Binaural and Monaural Word Identification by Subjects with Various Audiograms — Research Paper | ScholarLens