2009ChemotherapyRequires access

In vitro and in vivo Comparative Evaluations of Injectable Cephalosporin Derivatives and Ampicillin

Sachiko Gotô, Shōgo Kuwahara

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The in vitro and in vivo activity of the 5 injectable cephalosporins, cefazolin, cephaloridine, cephalothin, cephapirin, cephacetrile, and ampicillin was compared. No gram-positive organisms resistant to any of the cephalosporin derivatives were encountered. The MIC of ampicillin for gram-positive organisms was distributed over a wide range. The antibacterial activity of cefazolin, cephaloridine and ampicillin was high against gram-negative organisms. Ampicillin was potently effective especially against P. mirabilis and cefazolin especially against K. pneumoniae. The protecting effect of the 5 cephalosporins on experimental infections in mice was compared. The effect of cefazolin and cephaloridine was more marked than that of the others. These results may be explained by the fact that the other 3 cephalospoirins are rapidly metabolized in the living body.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The in vitro and in vivo activity of the 5 injectable cephalosporins, cefazolin, cephaloridine, cephalothin, cephapirin, cephacetrile, and ampicillin was compared. No gram-positive organisms resistant to any of the cephalosporin derivatives were encountered. The MIC of ampicillin for gram-positive organisms was distributed over a wide range. The antibacterial activity of cefazolin, cephaloridine and ampicillin was high against gram-negative organisms. Ampicillin was potently effective especially against P. mirabilis and cefazolin especially against K. pneumoniae. The protecting effect of the 5 cephalosporins on experimental infections in mice was compared. The effect of cefazolin and cephaloridine was more marked than that of the others. These results may be explained by the fact that the other 3 cephalospoirins are rapidly metabolized in the living body.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The in vitro and in vivo activity of the 5 injectable cephalosporins, cefazolin, cephaloridine, cephalothin, cephapirin, cephacetrile, and ampicillin was compared. No gram-positive organisms resistant to any of the cephalosporin derivatives were encountered. The MIC of ampicillin for gram-positive organisms was distributed over a wide range. The antibacterial activity of cefazolin, cephaloridine and ampicillin was high against gram-negative organisms. Ampicillin was potently effective especially against P. mirabilis and cefazolin especially against K. pneumoniae. The protecting effect of the 5 cephalosporins on experimental infections in mice was compared. The effect of cefazolin and cephaloridine was more marked than that of the others. These results may be explained by the fact that the other 3 cephalospoirins are rapidly metabolized in the living body.

Key concepts: Cephaloridine, Cefazolin, Ampicillin, Cephalosporin, In vivo, Chemistry, Microbiology, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In vitro and in vivo Comparative Evaluations of Injectable Cephalosporin Derivatives and Ampicillin — Research Paper | ScholarLens