1997NeurologyRequires access

Assessment of neuropsychological testing

Linas A. Bieliauskas, Kenneth M. Adams, Eileen B. Fennell, Thomas A. Hammeke, Bryon Rourke

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

To the Editor: We appreciate the consideration the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has given to neuropsychological testing of adults in its recent report by the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee (Neurology 1996;47:592-599) describing the important interface between the specialty practices of neurology and neuropsychology. Although the text of the manuscript is relatively comprehensive, we believe that there are aspects of neuropsychological practice beyond neuropsychological testing of which our neurologic colleagues may wish to be apprised. First, we wish to point out a few organizational relationships and publications that will aid understanding of the development and practice of professional neuropsychology. There are several organizations representing neuropsychologists, although they share overlapping memberships. These include the multidisciplinary International Neuropsychological Society, with more than 3,000 members, the National Academy of Neuropsychology, with more than 3,000 practicing neuropsychologists, and the Division of Clinical Neuropsychology (Division 40) of the American Psychological Association(APA), with more than 4,000 members. Division 40 represents clinical neuropsychology within organized psychology (the APA) and, in our understanding, functions in a fashion roughly analogous to the Specialty Section Council of Neurology (O) of the American Medical Association. Division 40 has actively established and promoted guidelines for neuropsychological practice, ranging from defining a clinical neuropsychologist20 to establishing …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To the Editor: We appreciate the consideration the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has given to neuropsychological testing of adults in its recent report by the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee (Neurology 1996;47:592-599) describing the important interface between the specialty practices of neurology and neuropsychology. Although the text of the manuscript is relatively comprehensive, we believe that there are aspects of neuropsychological practice beyond neuropsychological testing of which our neurologic colleagues may wish to be apprised. First, we wish to point out a few organizational relationships and publications that will aid understanding of the development and practice of professional neuropsychology. There are several organizations representing neuropsychologists, although they share overlapping memberships. These include the multidisciplinary International Neuropsychological Society, with more than 3,000 members, the National Academy of Neuropsychology, with more than 3,000 practicing neuropsychologists, and the Division of Clinical Neuropsychology (Division 40) of the American Psychological Association(APA), with more than 4,000 members. Division 40 represents clinical neuropsychology within organized psychology (the APA) and, in our understanding, functions in a fashion roughly analogous to the Specialty Section Council of Neurology (O) of the American Medical Association. Division 40 has actively established and promoted guidelines for neuropsychological practice, ranging from defining a clinical neuropsychologist20 to establishing …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To the Editor: We appreciate the consideration the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has given to neuropsychological testing of adults in its recent report by the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee (Neurology 1996;47:592-599) describing the important interface between the specialty practices of neurology and neuropsychology. Although the text of the manuscript is relatively comprehensive, we believe that there are aspects of neuropsychological practice beyond neuropsychological testing of which our neurologic colleagues may wish to be apprised. First, we wish to point out a few organizational relationships and publications that will aid understanding of the development and practice of professional neuropsychology. There are several organizations representing neuropsychologists, although they share overlapping memberships. These include the multidisciplinary International Neuropsychological Society, with more than 3,000 members, the National Academy of Neuropsychology, with more than 3,000 practicing neuropsychologists, and the Division of Clinical Neuropsychology (Division 40) of the American Psychological Association(APA), with more than 4,000 members. Division 40 represents clinical neuropsychology within organized psychology (the APA) and, in our understanding, functions in a fashion roughly analogous to the Specialty Section Council of Neurology (O) of the American Medical Association. Division 40 has actively established and promoted guidelines for neuropsychological practice, ranging from defining a clinical neuropsychologist20 to establishing …

Key concepts: Neuropsychology, Clinical neuropsychology, Psychology, Neurology, Specialty, Neuropsychological assessment, Medical education, Clinical psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of neuropsychological testing — Research Paper | ScholarLens