Maude versus Haskell: an Experimental Comparison in Security Protocol Analysis
David Basin, Grit Denker
Abstract
Open-access reader
David Basin, Grit Denker
Abstract
Open-access reader
We compare two executable languages: the rewriting logic based specification language Maude and the higher-order, lazy, functional programming language Haskell. We compare these languages experimentally on a problem in modeling and reasoning about a security protocol for authentication. We explore differences in how models can be formalized and analyzed, as well as performance and tool use.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We compare two executable languages: the rewriting logic based specification language Maude and the higher-order, lazy, functional programming language Haskell. We compare these languages experimentally on a problem in modeling and reasoning about a security protocol for authentication. We explore differences in how models can be formalized and analyzed, as well as performance and tool use.
Key concepts: Haskell, Programming language, Computer science, Executable, Functional programming, Rewriting, Protocol (science), Theoretical computer science