1985The LaryngoscopeOpen access

Facial plastic surgery in an otolaryngology training program

J. David Osguthorpe, W. Lomax

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

The medical complications and unsatisfactory results of facial plastic surgery performed by residents under close supervision are compared with those of the staff who train them and the literature. In 502 rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy, browlift, blepharoplasty, otoplasty, dermabrasion, and chemical peel procedures, there were no significant differences between the resident and staff operations except that residents required more time to perform the procedure. Operations which might be combined at one sitting should be staged during a resident's early experience with cosmetic surgery.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The medical complications and unsatisfactory results of facial plastic surgery performed by residents under close supervision are compared with those of the staff who train them and the literature. In 502 rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy, browlift, blepharoplasty, otoplasty, dermabrasion, and chemical peel procedures, there were no significant differences between the resident and staff operations except that residents required more time to perform the procedure. Operations which might be combined at one sitting should be staged during a resident's early experience with cosmetic surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The medical complications and unsatisfactory results of facial plastic surgery performed by residents under close supervision are compared with those of the staff who train them and the literature. In 502 rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy, browlift, blepharoplasty, otoplasty, dermabrasion, and chemical peel procedures, there were no significant differences between the resident and staff operations except that residents required more time to perform the procedure. Operations which might be combined at one sitting should be staged during a resident's early experience with cosmetic surgery.

Key concepts: Rhytidectomy, Otoplasty, Blepharoplasty, Dermabrasion, Plastic surgery, Otorhinolaryngology, Rhinoplasty, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Facial plastic surgery in an otolaryngology training program — Research Paper | ScholarLens