2011•Tel AvivRequires access

The Babylonia–Elam Connections in the Chaldaean and Achaemenid Periods (Part One)

Ran Zadok

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The paper discusses the political and economic connections between Babylonia and Elam during the periods of the Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid empires (626–539 and 538–332 BCe respectively). it is based on both published and unpublished sources in Neo/late-Babylonian as well as in Neo-elamite and Royal Achaemenid elamite. These are mostly implicit, as pertinent chronicles and royal inscriptions are rare. Therefore, the evidence for political history is minimal whereas the socioeconomic information is much more detailed. Nevertheless, even this information is chronologically uneven as most of it refers to the Chaldaean and early Achaemenid period with very few sources about the late Achaemenid period (483–332 BCe). An appendix is devoted to workmen from upper Mesopotamia and Syria ('Assyrians') in elam including Arabians. They were—at least partly—subjects of the Neo-Babylonian empire before its demise.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper discusses the political and economic connections between Babylonia and Elam during the periods of the Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid empires (626–539 and 538–332 BCe respectively). it is based on both published and unpublished sources in Neo/late-Babylonian as well as in Neo-elamite and Royal Achaemenid elamite. These are mostly implicit, as pertinent chronicles and royal inscriptions are rare. Therefore, the evidence for political history is minimal whereas the socioeconomic information is much more detailed. Nevertheless, even this information is chronologically uneven as most of it refers to the Chaldaean and early Achaemenid period with very few sources about the late Achaemenid period (483–332 BCe). An appendix is devoted to workmen from upper Mesopotamia and Syria ('Assyrians') in elam including Arabians. They were—at least partly—subjects of the Neo-Babylonian empire before its demise.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper discusses the political and economic connections between Babylonia and Elam during the periods of the Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid empires (626–539 and 538–332 BCe respectively). it is based on both published and unpublished sources in Neo/late-Babylonian as well as in Neo-elamite and Royal Achaemenid elamite. These are mostly implicit, as pertinent chronicles and royal inscriptions are rare. Therefore, the evidence for political history is minimal whereas the socioeconomic information is much more detailed. Nevertheless, even this information is chronologically uneven as most of it refers to the Chaldaean and early Achaemenid period with very few sources about the late Achaemenid period (483–332 BCe). An appendix is devoted to workmen from upper Mesopotamia and Syria ('Assyrians') in elam including Arabians. They were—at least partly—subjects of the Neo-Babylonian empire before its demise.

Key concepts: Ancient history, Politics, History, Demise, Period (music), Mesopotamia, Empire, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Babylonia–Elam Connections in the Chaldaean and Achaemenid Periods (Part One) — Research Paper | ScholarLens