2005•Review of Agricultural EconomicsRequires access

The Effect of Food Stamps on Food Security: A Panel Data Approach*

Parke Wilde, Mark Nord

Open publisher page 153 citations

Abstract

This research seeks to estimate the effect of Food Stamp Program (FSP) participation on security. The FSP is the U.S. Federal Government's largest intervention against hunger and insecurity. In fiscal year 2002, the program provided more benefits ($18 billion) and served more people on average each month (19.1 million) than the federal cash assistance program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. The federal government classifies a household as food secure if all household members have, at all times, access to enough for an active, healthy life. Official security estimates are based on eighteen survey items about symptoms of hardship in the past twelve months. Increasing security is an official FSP goal and a centerpiece of stamp policy debate. Yet, measuring the program's impact on security has proven difficult. Unobserved factors may influence measured security and the FSP participation decision. The potential problem of selection bias is stark. This research for the first time exploits the longitudinal structure of the federal government's flagship security survey to control for household-level fixed effects-constant unobserved factors that may influence both program participation and measured security. For example, if some households are simply more susceptible to hardships, they may be more likely to participate in the FSP and to be classified as food insecure. This research also controls for observable time-varying household conditions, such as the number of employed persons in the household and a rough measure of income. The empirical model does not control for unobserved factors that are time-varying,

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This research seeks to estimate the effect of Food Stamp Program (FSP) participation on security. The FSP is the U.S. Federal Government's largest intervention against hunger and insecurity. In fiscal year 2002, the program provided more benefits ($18 billion) and served more people on average each month (19.1 million) than the federal cash assistance program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. The federal government classifies a household as food secure if all household members have, at all times, access to enough for an active, healthy life. Official security estimates are based on eighteen survey items about symptoms of hardship in the past twelve months. Increasing security is an official FSP goal and a centerpiece of stamp policy debate. Yet, measuring the program's impact on security has proven difficult. Unobserved factors may influence measured security and the FSP participation decision. The potential problem of selection bias is stark. This research for the first time exploits the longitudinal structure of the federal government's flagship security survey to control for household-level fixed effects-constant unobserved factors that may influence both program participation and measured security. For example, if some households are simply more susceptible to hardships, they may be more likely to participate in the FSP and to be classified as food insecure. This research also controls for observable time-varying household conditions, such as the number of employed persons in the household and a rough measure of income. The empirical model does not control for unobserved factors that are time-varying,

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 153 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This research seeks to estimate the effect of Food Stamp Program (FSP) participation on security. The FSP is the U.S. Federal Government's largest intervention against hunger and insecurity. In fiscal year 2002, the program provided more benefits ($18 billion) and served more people on average each month (19.1 million) than the federal cash assistance program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. The federal government classifies a household as food secure if all household members have, at all times, access to enough for an active, healthy life. Official security estimates are based on eighteen survey items about symptoms of hardship in the past twelve months. Increasing security is an official FSP goal and a centerpiece of stamp policy debate. Yet, measuring the program's impact on security has proven difficult. Unobserved factors may influence measured security and the FSP participation decision. The potential problem of selection bias is stark. This research for the first time exploits the longitudinal structure of the federal government's flagship security survey to control for household-level fixed effects-constant unobserved factors that may influence both program participation and measured security. For example, if some households are simply more susceptible to hardships, they may be more likely to participate in the FSP and to be classified as food insecure. This research also controls for observable time-varying household conditions, such as the number of employed persons in the household and a rough measure of income. The empirical model does not control for unobserved factors that are time-varying,

Key concepts: Panel data, Food stamps, Food security, Business, Agricultural economics, Economics, Econometrics, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effect of Food Stamps on Food Security: A Panel Data Approach* — Research Paper | ScholarLens