2006•Journal of Essential Oil ResearchRequires access

The Analysis of the Content and Chemical Composition of Essential Oil in the Leaves of Sage (Salvia officinalisL.) cv. ‘Bona’ in the Second Year of Cultivation

Grażyna Zawiślak, Jan Dyduch

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The research was conducted in the years 1997–1999. The original material for the research was sage leaves (Salvia offcinalis L.) cv. ‘Bona’, which came from a two-year plantation. A three-year research study proved that the percentage amount of oil in the raw material of sage was related to the harvest time of the crop. It was higher in leaves coming from the second term of crop (middle of September) and ranged from 1.6% to 1.8%. The percentage amount of oil in sage leaves collected in May (frst crop) was lower and fluctuated between 0.8% and 1.4%. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of distilled oils were made using GC and GC/MS. The analyses demonstrated the presence of 31 components in the oil. We found that the oil components varied quantitatively, depending on the harvest time. The main components occurring in sage oil were α-thujone (18.4–27.9%), β-thujone (8.0–15.0%), 1,8-cineole (4.0–14.4%) and camphor (11.7–27.0%).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The research was conducted in the years 1997–1999. The original material for the research was sage leaves (Salvia offcinalis L.) cv. ‘Bona’, which came from a two-year plantation. A three-year research study proved that the percentage amount of oil in the raw material of sage was related to the harvest time of the crop. It was higher in leaves coming from the second term of crop (middle of September) and ranged from 1.6% to 1.8%. The percentage amount of oil in sage leaves collected in May (frst crop) was lower and fluctuated between 0.8% and 1.4%. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of distilled oils were made using GC and GC/MS. The analyses demonstrated the presence of 31 components in the oil. We found that the oil components varied quantitatively, depending on the harvest time. The main components occurring in sage oil were α-thujone (18.4–27.9%), β-thujone (8.0–15.0%), 1,8-cineole (4.0–14.4%) and camphor (11.7–27.0%).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The research was conducted in the years 1997–1999. The original material for the research was sage leaves (Salvia offcinalis L.) cv. ‘Bona’, which came from a two-year plantation. A three-year research study proved that the percentage amount of oil in the raw material of sage was related to the harvest time of the crop. It was higher in leaves coming from the second term of crop (middle of September) and ranged from 1.6% to 1.8%. The percentage amount of oil in sage leaves collected in May (frst crop) was lower and fluctuated between 0.8% and 1.4%. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of distilled oils were made using GC and GC/MS. The analyses demonstrated the presence of 31 components in the oil. We found that the oil components varied quantitatively, depending on the harvest time. The main components occurring in sage oil were α-thujone (18.4–27.9%), β-thujone (8.0–15.0%), 1,8-cineole (4.0–14.4%) and camphor (11.7–27.0%).

Key concepts: SAGE, Salvia officinalis, Camphor, Crop, Essential oil, Raw material, Horticulture, Composition (language)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Analysis of the Content and Chemical Composition of Essential Oil in the Leaves of Sage (Salvia officinalisL.) cv. ‘Bona’ in the Second Year of Cultivation — Research Paper | ScholarLens