2000Unpublished venueRequires access

Colorado Tunnels Case History

Gregg Sherry, Kent Pease

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of thirteen major tunnels in Colorado. The purpose of the paper is to document for easy reference the salient characteristics of the runnels for future reference and for comparison with potential future project. Included in the review of are: a summary of the ground conditions, runnel length and size, construction methods, support and lining types, and costs. Ail of the tunnels are situated in rock including shale, granite, gneiss, quartzite, and volcanic tuff. Review of these tunnels reveals changes in technologies few ground support and tunnel lining consistent with the industry. Additionally, it is noted that most of the tunnels used drill and blast excavation methods. However, if constructed with current technologies some of these tunnels, especially the long water tunnels, would likely be excavated with tunnel boring machines. Continued growth of Colorado's population with parallel needs for upgraded infrastructure in a mountainous area will likely result in more Colorado tunnels.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents an overview of thirteen major tunnels in Colorado. The purpose of the paper is to document for easy reference the salient characteristics of the runnels for future reference and for comparison with potential future project. Included in the review of are: a summary of the ground conditions, runnel length and size, construction methods, support and lining types, and costs. Ail of the tunnels are situated in rock including shale, granite, gneiss, quartzite, and volcanic tuff. Review of these tunnels reveals changes in technologies few ground support and tunnel lining consistent with the industry. Additionally, it is noted that most of the tunnels used drill and blast excavation methods. However, if constructed with current technologies some of these tunnels, especially the long water tunnels, would likely be excavated with tunnel boring machines. Continued growth of Colorado's population with parallel needs for upgraded infrastructure in a mountainous area will likely result in more Colorado tunnels.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents an overview of thirteen major tunnels in Colorado. The purpose of the paper is to document for easy reference the salient characteristics of the runnels for future reference and for comparison with potential future project. Included in the review of are: a summary of the ground conditions, runnel length and size, construction methods, support and lining types, and costs. Ail of the tunnels are situated in rock including shale, granite, gneiss, quartzite, and volcanic tuff. Review of these tunnels reveals changes in technologies few ground support and tunnel lining consistent with the industry. Additionally, it is noted that most of the tunnels used drill and blast excavation methods. However, if constructed with current technologies some of these tunnels, especially the long water tunnels, would likely be excavated with tunnel boring machines. Continued growth of Colorado's population with parallel needs for upgraded infrastructure in a mountainous area will likely result in more Colorado tunnels.

Key concepts: Excavation, Drill, Mining engineering, Geology, Salient, Situated, Population, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Colorado Tunnels Case History — Research Paper | ScholarLens