1997Historical BiologyRequires access

Survey of modern counterparts of schizochroal trilobite eyes: Structural and functional similarities and differences

Gábor Horváth, Euan N. K. Clarkson, Waltraud Pix

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Three main characters can be identified as typical of schizochroal trilobite eyes: well‐separated optical units, the presence of doublet lenses, and correction for spherical aberration. Surveying the structure and function of some known modern counterparts of schizochroal trilobite eyes, an attempt is made to reveal the functional significance of these characters. First the anatomy and the possible functioning of three different known eye types in trilobites ‐ holochroal, schizochroal and abathochroal ‐ are briefly reviewed. Then the structure of those animal eyes are considered, which share at least one of the above‐mentioned three characteristics with the schizochroal trilobite eyes. The structural and functional similarities and differences between schizochroal eyes and their modern counterparts are compared. The derivation of schizochroal eyes from holochroal ancestors are discussed. Finally, the possible evolution of the optics of trilobite lenses is outlined. Although our review supports the earlier idea that the schizochroal ommatidia probably had extended retinal structures behind them, none of the known modern counterparts considered are so compellingly similar to the trilobite eyes that they point to a clear solution of the way these ancient eyes worked. The most convincingly similar modern structure to compare with the schizochroal trilobite eye is the Strepsipteran eye that would repay further detailed studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three main characters can be identified as typical of schizochroal trilobite eyes: well‐separated optical units, the presence of doublet lenses, and correction for spherical aberration. Surveying the structure and function of some known modern counterparts of schizochroal trilobite eyes, an attempt is made to reveal the functional significance of these characters. First the anatomy and the possible functioning of three different known eye types in trilobites ‐ holochroal, schizochroal and abathochroal ‐ are briefly reviewed. Then the structure of those animal eyes are considered, which share at least one of the above‐mentioned three characteristics with the schizochroal trilobite eyes. The structural and functional similarities and differences between schizochroal eyes and their modern counterparts are compared. The derivation of schizochroal eyes from holochroal ancestors are discussed. Finally, the possible evolution of the optics of trilobite lenses is outlined. Although our review supports the earlier idea that the schizochroal ommatidia probably had extended retinal structures behind them, none of the known modern counterparts considered are so compellingly similar to the trilobite eyes that they point to a clear solution of the way these ancient eyes worked. The most convincingly similar modern structure to compare with the schizochroal trilobite eye is the Strepsipteran eye that would repay further detailed studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three main characters can be identified as typical of schizochroal trilobite eyes: well‐separated optical units, the presence of doublet lenses, and correction for spherical aberration. Surveying the structure and function of some known modern counterparts of schizochroal trilobite eyes, an attempt is made to reveal the functional significance of these characters. First the anatomy and the possible functioning of three different known eye types in trilobites ‐ holochroal, schizochroal and abathochroal ‐ are briefly reviewed. Then the structure of those animal eyes are considered, which share at least one of the above‐mentioned three characteristics with the schizochroal trilobite eyes. The structural and functional similarities and differences between schizochroal eyes and their modern counterparts are compared. The derivation of schizochroal eyes from holochroal ancestors are discussed. Finally, the possible evolution of the optics of trilobite lenses is outlined. Although our review supports the earlier idea that the schizochroal ommatidia probably had extended retinal structures behind them, none of the known modern counterparts considered are so compellingly similar to the trilobite eyes that they point to a clear solution of the way these ancient eyes worked. The most convincingly similar modern structure to compare with the schizochroal trilobite eye is the Strepsipteran eye that would repay further detailed studies.

Key concepts: Trilobite, Ommatidium, Paleontology, Biology, Evolutionary biology, Compound eye, Anatomy, Optics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Survey of modern counterparts of schizochroal trilobite eyes: Structural and functional similarities and differences — Research Paper | ScholarLens