2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Analysis of microbial community in atrazine treatment systems bioaugmented by genetically engineered microorganism

Chun Liu, Yanan Guo, Jingliang Yang, Xiangnan Luo, Liang Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Atrazine removal in membrane bioreactor (MBR) and conventional activated sludge reactor (CAS) bioaugmented by genetically engineered microorganism (GEM) was investigated. PCR-DGGE was used to analyze microbial community variation of both bioreactors in different running stages. The results indicated that high removal efficiency of atrazine was obtained in both bioreactors bioaugmented by GEM. The average removal efficiencies of atrazine reached up to 88.6% in MBR and 85.3% in CAS. Atrazine removal bioaugmented by GEM would be helpful to maintain sludge bioactivity in both bioreactors. The performance of MBR was better than CAS. The GEM density decreased quickly in both bioreactors after GEM inoculation and then became stable. The stable GEM densities in MBR and CAS were 2.1×103CFU/mL and 1.7×103CFU/mL, respectively. PCR-DGGE analysis showed microbial community variation in different running stages of both bioreactors. The biodiversity and stability of microbial community decreased in the presence of atrazine exposure and recovered after efficient atrazine removal. MBR seemed better than CAS to maintain biodiversity and stability of microbial community.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Atrazine removal in membrane bioreactor (MBR) and conventional activated sludge reactor (CAS) bioaugmented by genetically engineered microorganism (GEM) was investigated. PCR-DGGE was used to analyze microbial community variation of both bioreactors in different running stages. The results indicated that high removal efficiency of atrazine was obtained in both bioreactors bioaugmented by GEM. The average removal efficiencies of atrazine reached up to 88.6% in MBR and 85.3% in CAS. Atrazine removal bioaugmented by GEM would be helpful to maintain sludge bioactivity in both bioreactors. The performance of MBR was better than CAS. The GEM density decreased quickly in both bioreactors after GEM inoculation and then became stable. The stable GEM densities in MBR and CAS were 2.1×103CFU/mL and 1.7×103CFU/mL, respectively. PCR-DGGE analysis showed microbial community variation in different running stages of both bioreactors. The biodiversity and stability of microbial community decreased in the presence of atrazine exposure and recovered after efficient atrazine removal. MBR seemed better than CAS to maintain biodiversity and stability of microbial community.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Atrazine removal in membrane bioreactor (MBR) and conventional activated sludge reactor (CAS) bioaugmented by genetically engineered microorganism (GEM) was investigated. PCR-DGGE was used to analyze microbial community variation of both bioreactors in different running stages. The results indicated that high removal efficiency of atrazine was obtained in both bioreactors bioaugmented by GEM. The average removal efficiencies of atrazine reached up to 88.6% in MBR and 85.3% in CAS. Atrazine removal bioaugmented by GEM would be helpful to maintain sludge bioactivity in both bioreactors. The performance of MBR was better than CAS. The GEM density decreased quickly in both bioreactors after GEM inoculation and then became stable. The stable GEM densities in MBR and CAS were 2.1×103CFU/mL and 1.7×103CFU/mL, respectively. PCR-DGGE analysis showed microbial community variation in different running stages of both bioreactors. The biodiversity and stability of microbial community decreased in the presence of atrazine exposure and recovered after efficient atrazine removal. MBR seemed better than CAS to maintain biodiversity and stability of microbial community.

Key concepts: Atrazine, Bioreactor, Microbial population biology, Microorganism, Microbial consortium, Bioaugmentation, Biodegradation, Bioremediation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of microbial community in atrazine treatment systems bioaugmented by genetically engineered microorganism — Research Paper | ScholarLens