Monetary disturbance or financial market collapse: tests of two theories of the Great Depression
Barbara McKiernan
Abstract
Barbara McKiernan
Abstract
The monetary disturbance theory of the Depression, explained by Friedman and Schwartz (1963) asserts that the Depression was so deep and long because the Federal Reserve pursued a tight monetary policy. More recently, Bernanke (1983) has shown that financial market crisis also lowered output in the 1930s. It is probable that the decline in the money supply caused the credit market problems, but this may not be the main or the only avenue through which the money supply affected output. This paper shows that monetary aggregates have substantial explanatory power over output once the credit market collapse has been taken into account.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The monetary disturbance theory of the Depression, explained by Friedman and Schwartz (1963) asserts that the Depression was so deep and long because the Federal Reserve pursued a tight monetary policy. More recently, Bernanke (1983) has shown that financial market crisis also lowered output in the 1930s. It is probable that the decline in the money supply caused the credit market problems, but this may not be the main or the only avenue through which the money supply affected output. This paper shows that monetary aggregates have substantial explanatory power over output once the credit market collapse has been taken into account.
Key concepts: Economics, Great Depression, Monetary policy, Explanatory power, Depression (economics), Monetary economics, Financial crisis, Keynesian economics