2008Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineRequires access

Consultation With an Arthritis Specialist for Children With Suspected Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis

Debbie Ehrmann Feldman, Sasha Bernatsky, Michał Abrahamowicz, Yves Roy, Yongling Xiao, Jeannie Haggerty, Karen Leffondré, Pierre Tousignant, Ciarán M. Duffy

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe consultation with an arthritis specialist because of suspected new-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) and to determine factors associated with prompt consultation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Physician reimbursement administrative data were obtained for all children aged 16 years or younger in the Province of Québec (Canada). PARTICIPANTS: Suspected new-onset cases of JRA in 2000 were defined by a physician visit because of JRA, providing there had been no such claims in the preceding 3 years. MAIN EXPOSURE: First JRA diagnosis made by a non-arthritis specialist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First consultation with an arthritis specialist subsequent to diagnosis by a non-arthritis specialist and time to first consultation with an arthritis specialist. RESULTS: Of 352 children and adolescents with suspected new-onset JRA identified by non-arthritis specialists, 159 (45.2%) were subsequently seen by an arthritis specialist. Mean (SD) time to consultation for those seen was 115.3 (213.8) days (median, 28 days). Younger children were more likely to obtain care from an arthritis specialist compared with those having JRA first diagnosed by a general practitioner. CONCLUSION: Most patients with suspected new-onset JRA do not obtain prompt care from an arthritis specialist. Further research and action should focus on this issue so that outcomes may be optimized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To describe consultation with an arthritis specialist because of suspected new-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) and to determine factors associated with prompt consultation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Physician reimbursement administrative data were obtained for all children aged 16 years or younger in the Province of Québec (Canada). PARTICIPANTS: Suspected new-onset cases of JRA in 2000 were defined by a physician visit because of JRA, providing there had been no such claims in the preceding 3 years. MAIN EXPOSURE: First JRA diagnosis made by a non-arthritis specialist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First consultation with an arthritis specialist subsequent to diagnosis by a non-arthritis specialist and time to first consultation with an arthritis specialist. RESULTS: Of 352 children and adolescents with suspected new-onset JRA identified by non-arthritis specialists, 159 (45.2%) were subsequently seen by an arthritis specialist. Mean (SD) time to consultation for those seen was 115.3 (213.8) days (median, 28 days). Younger children were more likely to obtain care from an arthritis specialist compared with those having JRA first diagnosed by a general practitioner. CONCLUSION: Most patients with suspected new-onset JRA do not obtain prompt care from an arthritis specialist. Further research and action should focus on this issue so that outcomes may be optimized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe consultation with an arthritis specialist because of suspected new-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) and to determine factors associated with prompt consultation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Physician reimbursement administrative data were obtained for all children aged 16 years or younger in the Province of Québec (Canada). PARTICIPANTS: Suspected new-onset cases of JRA in 2000 were defined by a physician visit because of JRA, providing there had been no such claims in the preceding 3 years. MAIN EXPOSURE: First JRA diagnosis made by a non-arthritis specialist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First consultation with an arthritis specialist subsequent to diagnosis by a non-arthritis specialist and time to first consultation with an arthritis specialist. RESULTS: Of 352 children and adolescents with suspected new-onset JRA identified by non-arthritis specialists, 159 (45.2%) were subsequently seen by an arthritis specialist. Mean (SD) time to consultation for those seen was 115.3 (213.8) days (median, 28 days). Younger children were more likely to obtain care from an arthritis specialist compared with those having JRA first diagnosed by a general practitioner. CONCLUSION: Most patients with suspected new-onset JRA do not obtain prompt care from an arthritis specialist. Further research and action should focus on this issue so that outcomes may be optimized.

Key concepts: Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, Arthritis, Juvenile, Medicine, Rheumatoid arthritis, Physical therapy, Internal medicine, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consultation With an Arthritis Specialist for Children With Suspected Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis — Research Paper | ScholarLens