A reframe by any other name: on the process of refraining in strategic, Milan and analytic therapy
Carmel Flaskas
Abstract
Open-access reader
Carmel Flaskas
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper explores the process of reframing within strategic, Milan and analytic therapy. There are two purposes in exploring the different frameworks – the first is to clarify the differences in each framework; the second is to examine reframing as a generic process in therapy. In the course of the discussion, some common themes emerge. These include the question of the client's experience of therapy, the tendency to depersonalize the process of reframing, and the issue of truth in relation to reframing. Throughout the paper, there is an attempt to avoid the tendency in family therapy to treat difference competitively.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper explores the process of reframing within strategic, Milan and analytic therapy. There are two purposes in exploring the different frameworks – the first is to clarify the differences in each framework; the second is to examine reframing as a generic process in therapy. In the course of the discussion, some common themes emerge. These include the question of the client's experience of therapy, the tendency to depersonalize the process of reframing, and the issue of truth in relation to reframing. Throughout the paper, there is an attempt to avoid the tendency in family therapy to treat difference competitively.
Key concepts: Cognitive reframing, Process (computing), Family therapy, Epistemology, Relation (database), Psychology, Psychotherapist, Sociology