THROMBOPENIC PURPURA
Mark H. Roberts
Abstract
Mark H. Roberts
Abstract
HEREDITARY thrombopenic purpura has been the subject of considerable controversy. The standard textbooks mention the possibility of such a diathesis without definitely accepting its existence. Quick 1 stated: Although the suggestion has been made that there may be an hereditary or constitutional disposition to the disease (primary thrombocytopenic purpura), a careful study of the literature does not bear this out. However, Hess 2 in 1916 reported 3 cases of purpura from different families who showed low thrombocyte counts and gave a history of purpura in other members of the family. Unfortunately, he gave no laboratory data on the other members of the families. Glanzmann 3 in 1918 reviewed the entire subject of purpura. From his clinical observations and experiments he concluded that there is a hereditary hemorrhagic diathesis which affects both females and males, in contrast to hemophilia. In 1932, Witts 4 reported on three families who showed a hereditary
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
HEREDITARY thrombopenic purpura has been the subject of considerable controversy. The standard textbooks mention the possibility of such a diathesis without definitely accepting its existence. Quick 1 stated: Although the suggestion has been made that there may be an hereditary or constitutional disposition to the disease (primary thrombocytopenic purpura), a careful study of the literature does not bear this out. However, Hess 2 in 1916 reported 3 cases of purpura from different families who showed low thrombocyte counts and gave a history of purpura in other members of the family. Unfortunately, he gave no laboratory data on the other members of the families. Glanzmann 3 in 1918 reviewed the entire subject of purpura. From his clinical observations and experiments he concluded that there is a hereditary hemorrhagic diathesis which affects both females and males, in contrast to hemophilia. In 1932, Witts 4 reported on three families who showed a hereditary
Key concepts: Purpura (gastropod), Medicine, Geology, Paleontology