1995Marine Ecology Progress SeriesOpen access

Interrelationships in community structure between shallow-water marine meiofauna and macrofauna in relation to dredgings disposal

Paul J. Somerfield, HL Rees, R.M. Warwick

Open full text 103 citations

Abstract

Patterns in community structure of macrofauna (Day grab samples), nematodes (Craib core samples and subsamples from Day grabs) and copepods (Craib core samples) along a transect through a dredgings disposal site in Liverpool Bay, UK, are compared, and related to a range of environmental measurements Disposal of dredged material at the site has different effects on different components of the benthos Nematodes are more sensitive to sediment structure and the ongoing disposal of dredgings at the site, but the method used to sample them influences the perceived pattern of ~mpact.Subsampling from grabs is not found to be an adequate method of sampling meiofauna in studies designed to examine details of changes in community structure, although such samples may be sufficient for detecting that substantial changes have occurred.Macrofauna are more sensitive to concentrations of metals and longer term events at the site.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Patterns in community structure of macrofauna (Day grab samples), nematodes (Craib core samples and subsamples from Day grabs) and copepods (Craib core samples) along a transect through a dredgings disposal site in Liverpool Bay, UK, are compared, and related to a range of environmental measurements Disposal of dredged material at the site has different effects on different components of the benthos Nematodes are more sensitive to sediment structure and the ongoing disposal of dredgings at the site, but the method used to sample them influences the perceived pattern of ~mpact.Subsampling from grabs is not found to be an adequate method of sampling meiofauna in studies designed to examine details of changes in community structure, although such samples may be sufficient for detecting that substantial changes have occurred.Macrofauna are more sensitive to concentrations of metals and longer term events at the site.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 103 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Patterns in community structure of macrofauna (Day grab samples), nematodes (Craib core samples and subsamples from Day grabs) and copepods (Craib core samples) along a transect through a dredgings disposal site in Liverpool Bay, UK, are compared, and related to a range of environmental measurements Disposal of dredged material at the site has different effects on different components of the benthos Nematodes are more sensitive to sediment structure and the ongoing disposal of dredgings at the site, but the method used to sample them influences the perceived pattern of ~mpact.Subsampling from grabs is not found to be an adequate method of sampling meiofauna in studies designed to examine details of changes in community structure, although such samples may be sufficient for detecting that substantial changes have occurred.Macrofauna are more sensitive to concentrations of metals and longer term events at the site.

Key concepts: Meiobenthos, Community structure, Benthos, Transect, Ecology, Bay, Sediment, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interrelationships in community structure between shallow-water marine meiofauna and macrofauna in relation to dredgings disposal — Research Paper | ScholarLens