1998The Astrophysical JournalOpen access

The 69 Millisecond Radio Pulsar near the Supernova Remnant RCW 103

V. M. Kaspi, F. Crawford, R. N. Manchester, A. G. Lyne, F. Camilo, N. D’Amico, B. M. Gaensler

Open full text 37 citations

Abstract

We report the detection of the radio pulsar counterpart to the 69 ms X-ray pulsar discovered near the supernova remnant RCW 103 (G332.4-0.4). Our detection confirms that the pulsations arise from a rotation-powered neutron star, which we name PSR J1617-5055. The observed barycentric period derivative confirms that the pulsar has a characteristic age of only 8 kyr, the sixth youngest of all known pulsars. The unusual apparent youth of the pulsar and its proximity to a young remnant require that an association be considered. Although the respective ages and distances are consistent within substantial uncertainties, the large inferred pulsar transverse velocity is difficult to explain given the observed pulsar velocity distribution, the absence of evidence for a pulsar wind nebula, and the symmetry of the remnant. Rather, we argue that the objects are likely superposed on the sky; this is reasonable given the complex area. Without an association, the question of where is the supernova remnant left behind following the birth of PSR J1617-5055 remains open. We also discuss a possible association between PSR J1617-5055 and the γ-ray source 2CG 333+01. Although an association is energetically plausible, it is unlikely given that EGRET did not detect 2CG 333+01.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We report the detection of the radio pulsar counterpart to the 69 ms X-ray pulsar discovered near the supernova remnant RCW 103 (G332.4-0.4). Our detection confirms that the pulsations arise from a rotation-powered neutron star, which we name PSR J1617-5055. The observed barycentric period derivative confirms that the pulsar has a characteristic age of only 8 kyr, the sixth youngest of all known pulsars. The unusual apparent youth of the pulsar and its proximity to a young remnant require that an association be considered. Although the respective ages and distances are consistent within substantial uncertainties, the large inferred pulsar transverse velocity is difficult to explain given the observed pulsar velocity distribution, the absence of evidence for a pulsar wind nebula, and the symmetry of the remnant. Rather, we argue that the objects are likely superposed on the sky; this is reasonable given the complex area. Without an association, the question of where is the supernova remnant left behind following the birth of PSR J1617-5055 remains open. We also discuss a possible association between PSR J1617-5055 and the γ-ray source 2CG 333+01. Although an association is energetically plausible, it is unlikely given that EGRET did not detect 2CG 333+01.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We report the detection of the radio pulsar counterpart to the 69 ms X-ray pulsar discovered near the supernova remnant RCW 103 (G332.4-0.4). Our detection confirms that the pulsations arise from a rotation-powered neutron star, which we name PSR J1617-5055. The observed barycentric period derivative confirms that the pulsar has a characteristic age of only 8 kyr, the sixth youngest of all known pulsars. The unusual apparent youth of the pulsar and its proximity to a young remnant require that an association be considered. Although the respective ages and distances are consistent within substantial uncertainties, the large inferred pulsar transverse velocity is difficult to explain given the observed pulsar velocity distribution, the absence of evidence for a pulsar wind nebula, and the symmetry of the remnant. Rather, we argue that the objects are likely superposed on the sky; this is reasonable given the complex area. Without an association, the question of where is the supernova remnant left behind following the birth of PSR J1617-5055 remains open. We also discuss a possible association between PSR J1617-5055 and the γ-ray source 2CG 333+01. Although an association is energetically plausible, it is unlikely given that EGRET did not detect 2CG 333+01.

Key concepts: Pulsar, Physics, Supernova remnant, Astrophysics, Millisecond pulsar, Pulsar wind nebula, Pulsar planet, Astronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The 69 Millisecond Radio Pulsar near the Supernova Remnant RCW 103 — Research Paper | ScholarLens