2007•Unpublished venueRequires access

Automating Logic Rectification by Approximate SPFDs

Yu-Shen Yang, Subarna Sinha, Andreas G. Veneris, Robert K. Brayton

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

In the digital VLSI cycle, a netlist is often modified to correct design errors, perform small specification changes or implement incremental rewiring-based optimization operations. Most existing automated logic rectification tools use a small set of predefined logic transformations when they perform such modifications. This paper first shows that a small set of predefined transformations may not allow rectification to exploit the full potential of the design. Then, it proposes an automated simulation-based methodology to "approximate" sets of pairs of functions to be distinguished (SPFDs) and avoid the memory/time explosion problem. This representation is used by a SAT-based algorithm that devises appropriate logic transformations to fix a design. The SAT method is later complemented by a greedy one that improves on runtime performance. An extensive suite of experiments documents the added potential of the proposed rectification methodology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the digital VLSI cycle, a netlist is often modified to correct design errors, perform small specification changes or implement incremental rewiring-based optimization operations. Most existing automated logic rectification tools use a small set of predefined logic transformations when they perform such modifications. This paper first shows that a small set of predefined transformations may not allow rectification to exploit the full potential of the design. Then, it proposes an automated simulation-based methodology to "approximate" sets of pairs of functions to be distinguished (SPFDs) and avoid the memory/time explosion problem. This representation is used by a SAT-based algorithm that devises appropriate logic transformations to fix a design. The SAT method is later complemented by a greedy one that improves on runtime performance. An extensive suite of experiments documents the added potential of the proposed rectification methodology.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the digital VLSI cycle, a netlist is often modified to correct design errors, perform small specification changes or implement incremental rewiring-based optimization operations. Most existing automated logic rectification tools use a small set of predefined logic transformations when they perform such modifications. This paper first shows that a small set of predefined transformations may not allow rectification to exploit the full potential of the design. Then, it proposes an automated simulation-based methodology to "approximate" sets of pairs of functions to be distinguished (SPFDs) and avoid the memory/time explosion problem. This representation is used by a SAT-based algorithm that devises appropriate logic transformations to fix a design. The SAT method is later complemented by a greedy one that improves on runtime performance. An extensive suite of experiments documents the added potential of the proposed rectification methodology.

Key concepts: Netlist, Computer science, Rectification, Suite, Logic optimization, Set (abstract data type), Logic synthesis, Representation (politics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Automating Logic Rectification by Approximate SPFDs — Research Paper | ScholarLens