Automating Logic Rectification by Approximate SPFDs
Yu-Shen Yang, Subarna Sinha, Andreas G. Veneris, Robert K. Brayton
Abstract
Yu-Shen Yang, Subarna Sinha, Andreas G. Veneris, Robert K. Brayton
Abstract
In the digital VLSI cycle, a netlist is often modified to correct design errors, perform small specification changes or implement incremental rewiring-based optimization operations. Most existing automated logic rectification tools use a small set of predefined logic transformations when they perform such modifications. This paper first shows that a small set of predefined transformations may not allow rectification to exploit the full potential of the design. Then, it proposes an automated simulation-based methodology to "approximate" sets of pairs of functions to be distinguished (SPFDs) and avoid the memory/time explosion problem. This representation is used by a SAT-based algorithm that devises appropriate logic transformations to fix a design. The SAT method is later complemented by a greedy one that improves on runtime performance. An extensive suite of experiments documents the added potential of the proposed rectification methodology.
OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the digital VLSI cycle, a netlist is often modified to correct design errors, perform small specification changes or implement incremental rewiring-based optimization operations. Most existing automated logic rectification tools use a small set of predefined logic transformations when they perform such modifications. This paper first shows that a small set of predefined transformations may not allow rectification to exploit the full potential of the design. Then, it proposes an automated simulation-based methodology to "approximate" sets of pairs of functions to be distinguished (SPFDs) and avoid the memory/time explosion problem. This representation is used by a SAT-based algorithm that devises appropriate logic transformations to fix a design. The SAT method is later complemented by a greedy one that improves on runtime performance. An extensive suite of experiments documents the added potential of the proposed rectification methodology.
Key concepts: Netlist, Computer science, Rectification, Suite, Logic optimization, Set (abstract data type), Logic synthesis, Representation (politics)