New insights on anatomical location of components of the reentrant circuit and ablation therapy for atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia
Mark A. McGuire, M. J. Janse
Abstract
Mark A. McGuire, M. J. Janse
Abstract
The success of radiofrequency catheter ablation in the treatment of atrioventricular junctional, or atrioventricular nodal, reentrant tachycardia has rekindled interest in the electrophysiological and anatomical characteristics of the reentrant circuit. We conclude that there is no evidence that within the atrioventricular nodal area, which contains both the compact node and transitional cells, there are anatomically delineated dual or multiple pathways. Rather, the two main atrial inputs into the atrioventricular nodal area (posterior and anterior) seem to be the anatomically relevant structures for "slow" and "fast" pathways. Two other inputs (sinus septum and left atrial) may be the cause for multiple pathways in some individuals. Nonuniform anisotropic properties of the zone of transitional cells may account for slow or fast conduction in the same area, depending on directional differences of wavefronts. We prefer the term atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia rather than atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia because of mounting evidence that perinodal tissue is involved in the reentrant circuit. Finally, the role and origin of double extracellular electrograms is discussed. Further research is required to establish whether an anatomical or an electrogram-guided approach for catheter ablation is preferred.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The success of radiofrequency catheter ablation in the treatment of atrioventricular junctional, or atrioventricular nodal, reentrant tachycardia has rekindled interest in the electrophysiological and anatomical characteristics of the reentrant circuit. We conclude that there is no evidence that within the atrioventricular nodal area, which contains both the compact node and transitional cells, there are anatomically delineated dual or multiple pathways. Rather, the two main atrial inputs into the atrioventricular nodal area (posterior and anterior) seem to be the anatomically relevant structures for "slow" and "fast" pathways. Two other inputs (sinus septum and left atrial) may be the cause for multiple pathways in some individuals. Nonuniform anisotropic properties of the zone of transitional cells may account for slow or fast conduction in the same area, depending on directional differences of wavefronts. We prefer the term atrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia rather than atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia because of mounting evidence that perinodal tissue is involved in the reentrant circuit. Finally, the role and origin of double extracellular electrograms is discussed. Further research is required to establish whether an anatomical or an electrogram-guided approach for catheter ablation is preferred.
Key concepts: Reentrancy, Medicine, Ablation, Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular node, Cardiology, Internal medicine