Particles sorting in micro-channel using magnetic tweezers and optical tweezers
Yung‐Chiang Chung, Po‐Wen Chen, Chao‐Ming Fu, Jyun-Hong Jheng
Abstract
Yung‐Chiang Chung, Po‐Wen Chen, Chao‐Ming Fu, Jyun-Hong Jheng
Abstract
This study evaluates a method for separating magnetic microparticles in a micro channel by using embedded inverted-laser tweezers, a microflow pump, and a micro magnet. Various particles were separated using optical and/or magnetic tweezers, and were identified and counted to determine the dependence of the sorting rate on the channel flow velocity. The particle sorting experiment showed good separation results when the designed channel and magnetic tweezers were used. For magnetic particles, lower flow velocities corresponded to larger separating rates with a maximum separating rate of 81%. When the designed channel and optical tweezers were used, the polystyrene particle separating rate was as high as 94%. When both the optical tweezers and the magnetic tweezers were used, the optical tweezers were more effective in trapping polystyrene particles with flow velocities between 0.09 and 0.25μm/s. For flow velocities between 0.09 and 0.17 μm/s, the separating rate for polystyrene particles reached 95% and the separating rate for magnetic particles reached 85%.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study evaluates a method for separating magnetic microparticles in a micro channel by using embedded inverted-laser tweezers, a microflow pump, and a micro magnet. Various particles were separated using optical and/or magnetic tweezers, and were identified and counted to determine the dependence of the sorting rate on the channel flow velocity. The particle sorting experiment showed good separation results when the designed channel and magnetic tweezers were used. For magnetic particles, lower flow velocities corresponded to larger separating rates with a maximum separating rate of 81%. When the designed channel and optical tweezers were used, the polystyrene particle separating rate was as high as 94%. When both the optical tweezers and the magnetic tweezers were used, the optical tweezers were more effective in trapping polystyrene particles with flow velocities between 0.09 and 0.25μm/s. For flow velocities between 0.09 and 0.17 μm/s, the separating rate for polystyrene particles reached 95% and the separating rate for magnetic particles reached 85%.
Key concepts: Optical tweezers, Tweezers, Magnetic tweezers, Sorting, Volumetric flow rate, Materials science, Polystyrene, Particle (ecology)