1998Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRequires access

The Place of Laparoscopic Surgery in Surgical Gynaecology

Carl E. Wood, Peter J. Maher

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

This review was undertaken to ascertain whether the low usage of laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology resulted from unacceptable complication rates and long operating times. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery has been compared to that of laparotomy. Reports of controlled or comparative trials of laparoscopic gynaecological surgery for adhesions, infertility, ectopic pregnancy, oophorectomy, myomectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) have been reviewed between 1984 and 1997. Although further multicentre controlled trials may improve the assessment of complication rates for both laparotomy and laparoscopy procedures, laparoscopy appears to be as safe as laparotomy and generally has the advantage of shorter hospital stay and earlier return to normal activities. Except for LAVH, operating times of laparoscopic surgery are similar to that of laparotomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This review was undertaken to ascertain whether the low usage of laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology resulted from unacceptable complication rates and long operating times. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery has been compared to that of laparotomy. Reports of controlled or comparative trials of laparoscopic gynaecological surgery for adhesions, infertility, ectopic pregnancy, oophorectomy, myomectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) have been reviewed between 1984 and 1997. Although further multicentre controlled trials may improve the assessment of complication rates for both laparotomy and laparoscopy procedures, laparoscopy appears to be as safe as laparotomy and generally has the advantage of shorter hospital stay and earlier return to normal activities. Except for LAVH, operating times of laparoscopic surgery are similar to that of laparotomy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This review was undertaken to ascertain whether the low usage of laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology resulted from unacceptable complication rates and long operating times. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery has been compared to that of laparotomy. Reports of controlled or comparative trials of laparoscopic gynaecological surgery for adhesions, infertility, ectopic pregnancy, oophorectomy, myomectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) have been reviewed between 1984 and 1997. Although further multicentre controlled trials may improve the assessment of complication rates for both laparotomy and laparoscopy procedures, laparoscopy appears to be as safe as laparotomy and generally has the advantage of shorter hospital stay and earlier return to normal activities. Except for LAVH, operating times of laparoscopic surgery are similar to that of laparotomy.

Key concepts: Laparoscopic surgery, Medicine, General surgery, Gynecology, Laparoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Place of Laparoscopic Surgery in Surgical Gynaecology — Research Paper | ScholarLens