1987Japanese Circulation Journal-english EditionOpen access

Pathogenetic role of myocardial fiber disarray in the progression of cardiac fibrosis in normal hearts, hypertensive hearts and hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Masaru Tanaka, Hisayoshi Fujiwara, Tomoya Onodera, Der-Jinn Wu, Mitsuo Matsuda, Yoshihiro Hamashima, C Kawai

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

To define the pathogenetic role of myocardial fiber disarray in the progression of cardiac fibrosis, the percent area of fibrosis in tissue with disarray was compared with that in tissue without disarray. Thirty autopsied hearts, 10 from patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 10 from patients with hypertension and 10 from normal adults, were studied. The percent areas of fibrosis in tissues with and without disarray were significantly different (p less than 0.01) among hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (12.6 +/- 4.0 and 8.2 +/- 3.3%), hypertensive hearts (6.6 +/- 3.6 and 2.5 +/- 1.4%) and normal hearts (2.8 +/- 1.2 and 1.0 +/- 0.4%). The percent area of fibrosis in tissue with disarray was greater than in that without disarray in all 3 groups and the ratios of these percentages were similar in the 3 groups: 2.9 +/- 4.2 in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 2.5 +/- 1.7 in hypertensive hearts and 2.5 +/- 1.8 in normal hearts. The conclusions are: 1) disarray promotes fibrosis to a similar degree, not only in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but also in hypertensive hearts and normal hearts; 2) the increased level of fibrosis in hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and in hypertensive hearts, together with widespread fibrosis in hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in particular cannot be explained by disarray alone.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To define the pathogenetic role of myocardial fiber disarray in the progression of cardiac fibrosis, the percent area of fibrosis in tissue with disarray was compared with that in tissue without disarray. Thirty autopsied hearts, 10 from patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 10 from patients with hypertension and 10 from normal adults, were studied. The percent areas of fibrosis in tissues with and without disarray were significantly different (p less than 0.01) among hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (12.6 +/- 4.0 and 8.2 +/- 3.3%), hypertensive hearts (6.6 +/- 3.6 and 2.5 +/- 1.4%) and normal hearts (2.8 +/- 1.2 and 1.0 +/- 0.4%). The percent area of fibrosis in tissue with disarray was greater than in that without disarray in all 3 groups and the ratios of these percentages were similar in the 3 groups: 2.9 +/- 4.2 in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 2.5 +/- 1.7 in hypertensive hearts and 2.5 +/- 1.8 in normal hearts. The conclusions are: 1) disarray promotes fibrosis to a similar degree, not only in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but also in hypertensive hearts and normal hearts; 2) the increased level of fibrosis in hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and in hypertensive hearts, together with widespread fibrosis in hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in particular cannot be explained by disarray alone.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To define the pathogenetic role of myocardial fiber disarray in the progression of cardiac fibrosis, the percent area of fibrosis in tissue with disarray was compared with that in tissue without disarray. Thirty autopsied hearts, 10 from patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 10 from patients with hypertension and 10 from normal adults, were studied. The percent areas of fibrosis in tissues with and without disarray were significantly different (p less than 0.01) among hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (12.6 +/- 4.0 and 8.2 +/- 3.3%), hypertensive hearts (6.6 +/- 3.6 and 2.5 +/- 1.4%) and normal hearts (2.8 +/- 1.2 and 1.0 +/- 0.4%). The percent area of fibrosis in tissue with disarray was greater than in that without disarray in all 3 groups and the ratios of these percentages were similar in the 3 groups: 2.9 +/- 4.2 in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 2.5 +/- 1.7 in hypertensive hearts and 2.5 +/- 1.8 in normal hearts. The conclusions are: 1) disarray promotes fibrosis to a similar degree, not only in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but also in hypertensive hearts and normal hearts; 2) the increased level of fibrosis in hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and in hypertensive hearts, together with widespread fibrosis in hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in particular cannot be explained by disarray alone.

Key concepts: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Medicine, Internal medicine, Myocardial fibrosis, Fibrosis, Cardiology, Cardiomyopathy, Heart failure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pathogenetic role of myocardial fiber disarray in the progression of cardiac fibrosis in normal hearts, hypertensive hearts and hearts with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. — Research Paper | ScholarLens