2000•Community Development JournalRequires access

Community development in democratic South Africa

Scott A. Bollens

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

This article describes how developmental and democratization imperatives are confronting policymakers in post-apartheid South Africa with difficult choices in efforts to restructure government-community relations. It is based on a set of interviews with community leaders and government officials in Johannesburg in mid-1995. The civil society of non-governmental and community-based organizations, primarily constituted to resist an illegitimate state, is now in search of a proper role in a democratic South Africa. The community sector is faced with three challenges – its independence vis-a-vis government, its funding and technical support, and its local representativeness. Concurrently, tensions in the country's early democratic life between intensive community consultation and government implementation suggest that community engagement will need to be managed in a way that avoids the extremes of an unfettered 'people's democracy' or a reactionary authoritarianism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article describes how developmental and democratization imperatives are confronting policymakers in post-apartheid South Africa with difficult choices in efforts to restructure government-community relations. It is based on a set of interviews with community leaders and government officials in Johannesburg in mid-1995. The civil society of non-governmental and community-based organizations, primarily constituted to resist an illegitimate state, is now in search of a proper role in a democratic South Africa. The community sector is faced with three challenges – its independence vis-a-vis government, its funding and technical support, and its local representativeness. Concurrently, tensions in the country's early democratic life between intensive community consultation and government implementation suggest that community engagement will need to be managed in a way that avoids the extremes of an unfettered 'people's democracy' or a reactionary authoritarianism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article describes how developmental and democratization imperatives are confronting policymakers in post-apartheid South Africa with difficult choices in efforts to restructure government-community relations. It is based on a set of interviews with community leaders and government officials in Johannesburg in mid-1995. The civil society of non-governmental and community-based organizations, primarily constituted to resist an illegitimate state, is now in search of a proper role in a democratic South Africa. The community sector is faced with three challenges – its independence vis-a-vis government, its funding and technical support, and its local representativeness. Concurrently, tensions in the country's early democratic life between intensive community consultation and government implementation suggest that community engagement will need to be managed in a way that avoids the extremes of an unfettered 'people's democracy' or a reactionary authoritarianism.

Key concepts: Democracy, Democratization, Civil society, Government (linguistics), Political science, Reactionary, Representativeness heuristic, Authoritarianism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Community development in democratic South Africa — Research Paper | ScholarLens