1989The Hastings Center ReportRequires access

Ethical Perspectives on Prospective Payment

Charles J. Dougherty

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

The prospective payment system (PPS) for reimbursement of Medicare hospital charges through diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and peer review organizations (PROs) is explained and its ethical implications for health care are examined. Concern that PPS has had a negative impact on patients is focused around hospital admissions, care for the sickest of patients, the quality of hospital care, and the appropriateness of discharge from the hospital. Professionals who provide health care have felt the impact of PPS through new pressures from PROs and from hospital administrators, from caring for sicker patients, and from providing more care outside the hospital setting. Recommendations are made to monitor the quality of care in other settings after discharge from an acute care hospital, to control hospitals' ability to shift DRG profits out of direct patient care, to insulate health care professionals against financial pressures, and to maintain the vitality of informed consent. (KIE abstract)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The prospective payment system (PPS) for reimbursement of Medicare hospital charges through diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and peer review organizations (PROs) is explained and its ethical implications for health care are examined. Concern that PPS has had a negative impact on patients is focused around hospital admissions, care for the sickest of patients, the quality of hospital care, and the appropriateness of discharge from the hospital. Professionals who provide health care have felt the impact of PPS through new pressures from PROs and from hospital administrators, from caring for sicker patients, and from providing more care outside the hospital setting. Recommendations are made to monitor the quality of care in other settings after discharge from an acute care hospital, to control hospitals' ability to shift DRG profits out of direct patient care, to insulate health care professionals against financial pressures, and to maintain the vitality of informed consent. (KIE abstract)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The prospective payment system (PPS) for reimbursement of Medicare hospital charges through diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and peer review organizations (PROs) is explained and its ethical implications for health care are examined. Concern that PPS has had a negative impact on patients is focused around hospital admissions, care for the sickest of patients, the quality of hospital care, and the appropriateness of discharge from the hospital. Professionals who provide health care have felt the impact of PPS through new pressures from PROs and from hospital administrators, from caring for sicker patients, and from providing more care outside the hospital setting. Recommendations are made to monitor the quality of care in other settings after discharge from an acute care hospital, to control hospitals' ability to shift DRG profits out of direct patient care, to insulate health care professionals against financial pressures, and to maintain the vitality of informed consent. (KIE abstract)

Key concepts: Payment, Business, Prospective payment system, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ethical Perspectives on Prospective Payment — Research Paper | ScholarLens