Eristic, dialectic, and rhetoric
James Benjamin
Abstract
James Benjamin
Abstract
This essay explores the relationship of eristic (i.e., illegitimate argumentation) to dialectical and rhetorical argumentation. The research into the origins of eristic in ancient Greece indicates that eristic is fallacious dialectic that corresponds to fallacious argumentation in rhetoric and is motivated by a disregard for the rules of serious argumentative pursuits.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This essay explores the relationship of eristic (i.e., illegitimate argumentation) to dialectical and rhetorical argumentation. The research into the origins of eristic in ancient Greece indicates that eristic is fallacious dialectic that corresponds to fallacious argumentation in rhetoric and is motivated by a disregard for the rules of serious argumentative pursuits.
Key concepts: Argumentation theory, Dialectic, Argumentative, Rhetoric, Rhetorical question, Epistemology, Sociology, Philosophy