1975The Journal of GeologyRequires access

Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns: Tests for Randomness

Karl W. Flessa, Jeffrey S. Levinton

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

Patterns of origination within taxa, and patterns of dominance diversity among taxa are examined to distinguish nonrandom from random components. Numbers of first appearances per stage are sporadic and tend to be distributed nonrandomly through time. However, many taxa show a randomly distributed order of stages containing first appearances. A stochastic model of origination only partially reflects the patterns seen in the fossil record. Levels of dominance diversity among many taxa vary synchronously and at the same rates. The Phanerozoic is characterized by a succession of groups of taxa. Such associations are not predicted by a random model of diversity change. The fossil record is examined for evidence of an evolutionary equilibrium with constant taxonomic turnover. Fossil extinction and origination rates do not support the assumption of a static evolutionary equilibrium. Taxonomic and morphological evidence is consistent with a model of progressive specialization through the Phanerozoic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Patterns of origination within taxa, and patterns of dominance diversity among taxa are examined to distinguish nonrandom from random components. Numbers of first appearances per stage are sporadic and tend to be distributed nonrandomly through time. However, many taxa show a randomly distributed order of stages containing first appearances. A stochastic model of origination only partially reflects the patterns seen in the fossil record. Levels of dominance diversity among many taxa vary synchronously and at the same rates. The Phanerozoic is characterized by a succession of groups of taxa. Such associations are not predicted by a random model of diversity change. The fossil record is examined for evidence of an evolutionary equilibrium with constant taxonomic turnover. Fossil extinction and origination rates do not support the assumption of a static evolutionary equilibrium. Taxonomic and morphological evidence is consistent with a model of progressive specialization through the Phanerozoic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Patterns of origination within taxa, and patterns of dominance diversity among taxa are examined to distinguish nonrandom from random components. Numbers of first appearances per stage are sporadic and tend to be distributed nonrandomly through time. However, many taxa show a randomly distributed order of stages containing first appearances. A stochastic model of origination only partially reflects the patterns seen in the fossil record. Levels of dominance diversity among many taxa vary synchronously and at the same rates. The Phanerozoic is characterized by a succession of groups of taxa. Such associations are not predicted by a random model of diversity change. The fossil record is examined for evidence of an evolutionary equilibrium with constant taxonomic turnover. Fossil extinction and origination rates do not support the assumption of a static evolutionary equilibrium. Taxonomic and morphological evidence is consistent with a model of progressive specialization through the Phanerozoic.

Key concepts: Origination, Phanerozoic, Taxon, Dominance (genetics), Paleontology, Extinction (optical mineralogy), Randomness, Taxonomic rank

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns: Tests for Randomness — Research Paper | ScholarLens