1989Applied Engineering in AgricultureRequires access

Field Evaluation of Sugarcane Planters

R. L. Parish, Patrick P. Chaney, F. E. Baker

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Eight mechanical sugarcane planters and three planting aids were evaluated on the basis of uniformity of planting and damage to the cane stalks. Four automatic feed control systems were included in the tests. The results indicate that hand planting with planting aids yields better uniformity than is obtained with mechanical planters. There was no significant difference in uniformity between manual and automatic control. There were significant differences among planters in degree of damage to the eyes on the stalks of seed cane. Several of the mechanical planters did significantly more damage to the cane than was noted with hand planting. Rates of planting varied from 69,000 to 274,000 eyes/ha (28,000 to 111,000 eyes/acre).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Eight mechanical sugarcane planters and three planting aids were evaluated on the basis of uniformity of planting and damage to the cane stalks. Four automatic feed control systems were included in the tests. The results indicate that hand planting with planting aids yields better uniformity than is obtained with mechanical planters. There was no significant difference in uniformity between manual and automatic control. There were significant differences among planters in degree of damage to the eyes on the stalks of seed cane. Several of the mechanical planters did significantly more damage to the cane than was noted with hand planting. Rates of planting varied from 69,000 to 274,000 eyes/ha (28,000 to 111,000 eyes/acre).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Eight mechanical sugarcane planters and three planting aids were evaluated on the basis of uniformity of planting and damage to the cane stalks. Four automatic feed control systems were included in the tests. The results indicate that hand planting with planting aids yields better uniformity than is obtained with mechanical planters. There was no significant difference in uniformity between manual and automatic control. There were significant differences among planters in degree of damage to the eyes on the stalks of seed cane. Several of the mechanical planters did significantly more damage to the cane than was noted with hand planting. Rates of planting varied from 69,000 to 274,000 eyes/ha (28,000 to 111,000 eyes/acre).

Key concepts: Sowing, Cane, Acre, Agronomy, Significant difference, Field experiment, Biology, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field Evaluation of Sugarcane Planters — Research Paper | ScholarLens