2013Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic SurgeryOpen access

Comparision of vacuum-asisted closure and moist wound dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

Hamed Ghoddusi Johari, Hassan Ravari, M H Saeid Modaghegh, Gholamhosein Kazemzadeh, AttiehMohammadzadeh Vatanchi, Abolghasem Sangaki, MohammadVahedian Shahrodi

Open full text 39 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is a new method in wound care which speeds wound healing by causing vacuum, improving tissue perfusion and suctioning the exudates. This study aims to evaluate its efficacy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with diabetic foot ulcers were enrolled in the moist dressing group, and 10 patients in the VAC group. The site, size and depth of the wound were inspected and recorded before and every three days during the study period. Patient satisfaction and formation of granulation tissue were also assessed. RESULTS: Improvement of the wound in the form of reducing the diameter and depth and increasing proliferation of granulation tissue was significant in most of the patients of the VAC group after two weeks. Satisfaction of patients in the VAC group was evaluated as excellent as no amputation was done in this group. Wagner score was reduced in both the study groups, although this decrement was not significant in the moist dressing group. CONCLUSION: VAC appears to be as safe as and more efficacious than moist dressing for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is a new method in wound care which speeds wound healing by causing vacuum, improving tissue perfusion and suctioning the exudates. This study aims to evaluate its efficacy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with diabetic foot ulcers were enrolled in the moist dressing group, and 10 patients in the VAC group. The site, size and depth of the wound were inspected and recorded before and every three days during the study period. Patient satisfaction and formation of granulation tissue were also assessed. RESULTS: Improvement of the wound in the form of reducing the diameter and depth and increasing proliferation of granulation tissue was significant in most of the patients of the VAC group after two weeks. Satisfaction of patients in the VAC group was evaluated as excellent as no amputation was done in this group. Wagner score was reduced in both the study groups, although this decrement was not significant in the moist dressing group. CONCLUSION: VAC appears to be as safe as and more efficacious than moist dressing for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is a new method in wound care which speeds wound healing by causing vacuum, improving tissue perfusion and suctioning the exudates. This study aims to evaluate its efficacy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with diabetic foot ulcers were enrolled in the moist dressing group, and 10 patients in the VAC group. The site, size and depth of the wound were inspected and recorded before and every three days during the study period. Patient satisfaction and formation of granulation tissue were also assessed. RESULTS: Improvement of the wound in the form of reducing the diameter and depth and increasing proliferation of granulation tissue was significant in most of the patients of the VAC group after two weeks. Satisfaction of patients in the VAC group was evaluated as excellent as no amputation was done in this group. Wagner score was reduced in both the study groups, although this decrement was not significant in the moist dressing group. CONCLUSION: VAC appears to be as safe as and more efficacious than moist dressing for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Key concepts: Medicine, Diabetic foot, Closure (psychology), Wound closure, Foot (prosody), Diabetic ulcers, Surgery, Diabetes mellitus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparision of vacuum-asisted closure and moist wound dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers — Research Paper | ScholarLens